Brian Cole to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.
Connection Strength
8.460
-
Editorial Commentary: Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Medial Meniscal Transplantation Improve Functional Outcomes When Properly Indicated. Arthroscopy. 2023 06; 39(6):1593-1594.
Score: 0.717
-
Medial Meniscus Transplantation and Bone-Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb 01; 30(3):104-110.
Score: 0.654
-
Return-to-Sport Rate and Activity Level Are High Following Arthroscopic All-Inside Meniscal Repair With and Without Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2351-2360.
Score: 0.615
-
Lateral Augmentation Procedures in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomic, Biomechanical, Imaging, and Clinical Evidence. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):740-752.
Score: 0.496
-
Patient Understanding, Expectations, Outcomes, and Satisfaction Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Surgical Management. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1092-1096.
Score: 0.467
-
Hamstring Activity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patient: Injury Implications and Comparison With Quadriceps Activity. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1651-9.
Score: 0.437
-
Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
Score: 0.376
-
Rapid chondrolysis of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jan; 92(1):186-9.
Score: 0.283
-
Consistent Indications and Good Outcomes Despite High Variability in Techniques for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 09; 39(9):2098-2111.
Score: 0.176
-
Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2023 03; 51(3):605-614.
Score: 0.175
-
Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
Score: 0.168
-
Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative. Am J Sports Med. 2022 06; 50(7):1788-1797.
Score: 0.167
-
Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
Score: 0.165
-
Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
Score: 0.165
-
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation May Accelerate Allograft Ligamentization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2255-2264.
Score: 0.163
-
Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
Score: 0.161
-
The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
Score: 0.159
-
Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
Score: 0.157
-
Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2020 10; 48(12):2978-2985.
Score: 0.148
-
Preoperative Opioid Use Predicts Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use and Inferior Patient Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2681-2688.e1.
Score: 0.146
-
Does Bone Plug and Graft Orientation (Inferior Versus Posterior) Alter Native Femoral Footprint Coverage in Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1875-1881.
Score: 0.143
-
Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
Score: 0.137
-
Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
Score: 0.136
-
Video Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Professional American Football Athletes: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2018 12; 46(14):NP73-NP74.
Score: 0.131
-
Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2501-2509.
Score: 0.131
-
Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
Score: 0.127
-
Video Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Professional American Football Athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 03; 46(4):862-868.
Score: 0.124
-
The Utility of Biologics, Osteotomy, and Cartilage Restoration in the Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Jan 01; 26(1):e11-e25.
Score: 0.123
-
Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
Score: 0.123
-
Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep; 45(11):2586-2594.
Score: 0.119
-
Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
Score: 0.118
-
Dial Test: Unrecognized Predictor of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jul; 33(7):1375-1381.
Score: 0.117
-
Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years: How Do They Compare With Younger Patients? A Systematic Review and Comparison With Younger Populations. Sports Health. 2016 Mar-Apr; 8(2):177-81.
Score: 0.108
-
High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16; 97(18):1529-42.
Score: 0.105
-
Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
Score: 0.100
-
Trends in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among National Basketball Association team physicians. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Jun; 43(6):267-71.
Score: 0.096
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
Score: 0.095
-
Articular and meniscal pathology associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2013 Jun; 26(3):185-93.
Score: 0.086
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femoral tunnel drilling preference among orthopaedic surgeons. Knee. 2021 Mar; 29:564-570.
Score: 0.039
-
The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 02; 37(2):600-605.
Score: 0.037
-
Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
Score: 0.027
-
Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 May; 23(5):283-96.
Score: 0.026
-
Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
Score: 0.025
-
Effect of tibial tunnel diameter on femoral tunnel placement in transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan; 24(1):51-7.
Score: 0.025
-
Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
Score: 0.024
-
Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct; 42(10):2363-70.
Score: 0.024
-
Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
Score: 0.024
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation and Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):1583-91.
Score: 0.024
-
Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19; 96(4):292-300.
Score: 0.024
-
Can anatomic femoral tunnel placement be achieved using a transtibial technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 39(6):1263-9.
Score: 0.019
-
The incidence of acute patellar tendon harvest complications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb; 24(2):162-6.
Score: 0.015
-
Surgical management of knee dislocations. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar; 87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):1-21.
Score: 0.013