Header Logo

Connection

Brian Cole to Biomechanical Phenomena

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about Biomechanical Phenomena.
Brian Cole
Connection Strength
2.022
Biomechanical Phenomena
  1. Concomitant Meniscotibial Ligament Reconstruction Decreases Meniscal Extrusion Following Medial Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: A Cadaveric Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2022 Nov; 38(11):3080-3089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  2. Lateral Augmentation Procedures in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomic, Biomechanical, Imaging, and Clinical Evidence. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):740-752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  3. Tibial Tuberosity Osteotomy: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug; 42(8):2006-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  4. ADAMTS5 is required for biomechanically-stimulated healing of murine tendinopathy. J Orthop Res. 2013 Oct; 31(10):1540-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  5. Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a systematic review on the biomechanical importance of tying the medial row. Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb; 29(2):377-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  6. Effects of serial sectioning and repair of radial tears in the lateral meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug; 40(8):1863-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  7. Role of biomechanics in rotator cuff pathology: North American perspective. Med Sport Sci. 2012; 57:18-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  8. Biomechanical factors in rotator cuff pathology. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011 Sep; 19(3):202-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  9. Evolution of rotator cuff repair techniques: are our patients really benefiting? Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:123-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  10. Medial versus lateral supraspinatus tendon properties: implications for double-row rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Dec; 38(12):2456-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  11. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jun; 23(6):662-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  12. Treatment of chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint. J Knee Surg. 2006 Oct; 19(4):285-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  13. Trochlear contact pressures after anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov; 33(11):1710-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  14. Cartilage restoration, part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb; 33(2):295-306.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  15. Contact pressure at osteochondral donor sites in the patellofemoral joint. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jun; 32(4):967-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  16. Allograft interference screw fixation in meniscus transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2004 Mar; 20(3):322-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  17. Indirect arthroscopic rotator interval repair. Arthroscopy. 2003 Jul-Aug; 19(6):E28-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  18. The use of allografts in orthopaedic surgery. Instr Course Lect. 2002; 51:507-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  19. Arthroscopic Bankart repair with the Suretac device for traumatic anterior shoulder instability in athletes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jul; 32(3):411-21, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  20. The quadriceps insertion of the medial patellofemoral complex demonstrates the greatest anisometry through flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar; 29(3):757-763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  21. Differential Contributions of the Quadriceps and Patellar Attachments of the Proximal Medial Patellar Restraints to Resisting Lateral Patellar Translation. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1670-1676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  22. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2019 06; 35(6):1760-1768.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  23. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis With PEEK Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Analysis of Humeral Fracture Risk. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):806-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  24. Biomechanical Analysis of Latarjet Screw Fixation: Comparison of Screw Types and Fixation Methods. Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep; 33(9):1646-1653.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  25. The Relationship Between Pitching Mechanics and Injury: A Review of Current Concepts. Sports Health. 2017 May/Jun; 9(3):216-221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  26. Epidemiologic Comparison of Pitching Mechanics, Pitch Type, and Pitch Counts Among Healthy Pitchers at Various Levels of Youth Competition. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1559-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  27. Effect of highly purified capsaicin on articular cartilage and rotator cuff tendon healing: An in vivo rabbit study. J Orthop Res. 2015 Dec; 33(12):1854-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  28. Correlates With History of Injury in Youth and Adolescent Pitchers. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1349-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  29. Predictors of throwing velocity in youth and adolescent pitchers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep; 24(9):1339-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  30. Postoperative restoration of upper extremity motion and neuromuscular control during the overhand pitch: evaluation of tenodesis and repair for superior labral anterior-posterior tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec; 42(12):2825-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  31. Comparison of glenohumeral contact pressures and contact areas after posterior glenoid reconstruction with an iliac crest bone graft or distal tibial osteochondral allograft. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2574-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  32. Upper extremity physeal injury in young baseball pitchers. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep; 42(3):100-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  33. Role of the superior labrum after biceps tenodesis in glenohumeral stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr; 23(4):485-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  34. Comparison of glenohumeral contact pressures and contact areas after glenoid reconstruction with latarjet or distal tibial osteochondral allografts. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug; 41(8):1900-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  35. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  36. Effect of reamer design on posteriorization of the tibial tunnel during endoscopic transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun; 41(6):1282-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  37. Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter? Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb; 41(2):283-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  38. Biomechanical analysis of the pectoralis major tendon and comparison of techniques for tendo-osseous repair. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug; 40(8):1887-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  39. Biomechanical evaluation of a high tibial osteotomy with a meniscal transplant. J Knee Surg. 2011 Mar; 24(1):45-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  40. Patellofemoral kinematics after limited resurfacing of the trochlea. J Knee Surg. 2009 Oct; 22(4):310-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  41. Measurement of glenoid bone loss: a comparison of measurement error between 45 degrees and 0 degrees bone loss models and with different posterior arthroscopy portal locations. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1132-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  42. The effects of medial meniscal transplantation techniques on intra-articular contact pressures. J Knee Surg. 2008 Jan; 21(1):20-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  43. Anteromedialization: review and technique. J Knee Surg. 2007 Apr; 20(2):120-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.