Header Logo

Connection

Brian Cole to United States

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about United States.
Connection Strength

1.214
  1. Cartilage Restoration Surgery: Incidence Rates, Complications, and Trends as Reported by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Candidates. Arthroscopy. 2019 01; 35(1):171-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  2. Management of Chondral Lesions of the Knee: Analysis of Trends and Short-Term Complications Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Arthroscopy. 2019 01; 35(1):138-146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  3. Reoperation Rates After Cartilage Restoration Procedures in the Knee: Analysis of a Large US Commercial Database. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jun; 47(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  4. Trends in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the United States, 2007 to 2011. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1123-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  5. Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the United States: an analysis of a large private-payer database over a period of 8 years. Arthroscopy. 2014 Feb; 30(2):222-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  6. An epidemiologic analysis of clinical practice guidelines for non-arthroplasty treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jan; 30(1):65-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  7. Trends in meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005-2011. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct; 41(10):2333-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  8. Postsurgical glenohumeral arthritis in young adults. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Sep; 37(9):1784-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  9. Abnormal findings on knee magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic NBA players. J Knee Surg. 2008 Jan; 21(1):27-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. Injectable corticosteroids in modern practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb; 13(1):37-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  11. Chondral injuries. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Mar; 14(2):134-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  12. PROMIS Upper Extremity underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing primary rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Apr; 31(4):718-725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  13. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femoral tunnel drilling preference among orthopaedic surgeons. Knee. 2021 Mar; 29:564-570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  14. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Preference Most Dependent on Patient Age: A Survey of United States Surgeons. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1559-1566.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  15. Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011. J Orthop Res. 2021 02; 39(2):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  16. Practice Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun 01; 28(11):464-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  17. What Is the Appropriate Price for Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis? A?Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Evidence From Level I Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1983-1991.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  18. Should We Question the External Validity of Database Studies? A Comparative Analysis of?Demographics. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2686-2694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  19. Video Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Professional American Football Athletes: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2018 12; 46(14):NP73-NP74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  20. Video Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Professional American Football Athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 03; 46(4):862-868.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  21. Optimizing hospital reimbursement through physician awareness: a step toward better patient care. Orthopedics. 1998 Jan; 21(1):79-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  22. Inconsistencies Between Physician-Reported Disclosures at the AAOS Annual Meeting and Industry-Reported Financial Disclosures in the Open Payments Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19; 98(20):e90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  23. Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based study comparing adverse event and readmission rates to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Nov; 25(11):1780-1786.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  24. Risk Factors for Short-term Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar; 44(3):618-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  25. High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16; 97(18):1529-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  26. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnosis of meniscus tears. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan; 43(1):128-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  27. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct; 42(10):2363-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  28. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  29. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation and Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):1583-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  30. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  31. Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan; 38(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.