Brian Cole to Tomography, X-Ray Computed
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Connection Strength
1.248
-
Topographic analysis of the glenoid and proximal medial tibial articular surfaces: a search for the ideal match for glenoid resurfacing. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug; 41(8):1893-9.
Score: 0.339
-
Dynamic 3-Dimensional Mapping of Isometric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Is Anatomic Also Isometric? Arthroscopy. 2018 08; 34(8):2466-2475.
Score: 0.120
-
Variability in the Contour of Cadaveric Anterior and Posterior Glenoids Based on Ipsilateral 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions: Implications for Clinical Estimation of Bone Loss. Arthroscopy. 2018 09; 34(9):2560-2566.
Score: 0.120
-
Topographic Analysis of the Distal Femoral Condyle Articular Cartilage Surface: Adequacy of the Graft from Opposite Condyles of the Same or Different Size for the Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation. Cartilage. 2019 04; 10(2):205-213.
Score: 0.116
-
Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantification: Cadaveric Study. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr; 33(4):709-715.
Score: 0.107
-
Topographic analysis of the capitellum and distal femoral condyle: finding the best match for treating osteochondral defects of the humeral capitellum. Arthroscopy. 2015 May; 31(5):843-9.
Score: 0.094
-
Topographic Analysis of Lateral Versus Medial Femoral Condyle Donor Sites for Oblong Medial Femoral Condyle Lesions. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2900-2908.
Score: 0.034
-
Dynamic Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Mapping of Isometric Posterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Single- Versus Double-Bundle Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2875-2884.
Score: 0.034
-
A Flat Anterior Glenoid Corresponds to Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss. Arthroscopy. 2019 06; 35(6):1788-1793.
Score: 0.032
-
Automated 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allows for Accurate Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss Compared With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography. Arthroscopy. 2019 03; 35(3):734-740.
Score: 0.031
-
Topographic Matching of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Using Lateral Femoral Condyle for the Treatment of Medial Femoral Condyle Lesions: A?Computer-Simulated Model Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 11; 34(11):3033-3042.
Score: 0.031
-
Proximal fixation anterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle optimizes isometry in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Mar; 27(3):875-884.
Score: 0.030
-
The Influence of Bone Loss on Glenoid Version Measurement: A Computer-Modeled Cadaveric Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2018 08; 34(8):2319-2323.
Score: 0.030
-
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma at the site of a total hip replacement: review of the literature and case report. Skeletal Radiol. 1997 Sep; 26(9):559-63.
Score: 0.028
-
Optimization of Anteromedial Portal Femoral Tunnel Drilling With Flexible and Straight Reamers in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A?Cadaveric 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography?Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1036-1043.
Score: 0.027
-
Distal Tibia Allograft Glenoid Reconstruction in Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):891-897.
Score: 0.027
-
Outcomes assessment in rotator cuff pathology: what are we measuring? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Dec; 24(12):2008-15.
Score: 0.025
-
Glenoid diameter is an inaccurate method for percent glenoid bone loss quantification: analysis and techniques for improved accuracy. Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr; 31(4):608-614.e1.
Score: 0.024