Header Logo

Connection

Brian Cole to Surveys and Questionnaires

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
Connection Strength

0.923
  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments Correlate Better With Legacy Measures in Knee Cartilage Patients at Postoperative Than at Preoperative Assessment. Arthroscopy. 2020 05; 36(5):1419-1428.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  2. Return to sport following isolated opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee. 2019 Dec; 26(6):1306-1312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  3. Long-term Clinical Outcomes After Microfracture of the Glenohumeral Joint: Average 10-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2018 03; 46(4):786-794.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  4. Patient Preference Before and After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Which Is More Important, Pain Relief or Strength Return? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jul/Aug; 46(4):E244-E250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  5. Methodologic quality of knee articular cartilage studies. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1243-1252.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  6. Outcomes of type II superior labrum, anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair: prospective evaluation at a minimum two-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Sep; 19(6):859-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  7. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2010 May; 38(5):891-902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  8. Comparison of arthroscopic and open anterior shoulder stabilization. A two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Aug; 82(8):1108-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  9. Relationship between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing and legacy instruments in patients undergoing isolated biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun; 29(6):1214-1222.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  10. The Impact of Workers' Compensation on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity and Legacy Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 10; 35(10):2817-2824.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  11. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  12. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  13. Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May; 28(5):939-948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  14. Functional results of bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jun; 26(6):990-996.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. A comprehensive analysis of pectoralis major transfer for long thoracic nerve palsy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jul; 24(7):1028-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patella: a multicenter experience. Am J Sports Med. 2014 May; 42(5):1074-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  17. Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60?years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar; 23(3):395-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  18. Outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients aged 70 years or older. Arthroscopy. 2010 Oct; 26(10):1273-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  19. Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan; 38(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.