Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Charles Bush-Joseph and Shane Nho.
Connection Strength

3.952
  1. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Endoscopic Repair of Partial Articular Gluteus Tendon Avulsion. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Jun; 5(3):e425-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.532
  2. Effect of prior ipsilateral lower extremity surgery on 2-year outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Aug; 6(3):241-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  3. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Improves Sleep Quality Postoperatively. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):461-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  4. Anatomy of the Pudendal Nerve and Other Neural Structures Around the Proximal Hamstring Origin in Males. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2105-2110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  5. Ability to return to work without restrictions in workers compensation patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jan; 4(1):30-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  6. Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18; 98(10):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  7. Hip Arthroscopy Surgical Volume Trends and 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  8. All-Endoscopic Single-Row Repair of Full-Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Feb; 5(1):e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  9. Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar; 32(3):468-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  10. Fifty Most Cited Articles for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy. Front Surg. 2015; 2:41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  11. Sex Differences in Patients With CAM Deformities With Femoroacetabular Impingement: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Quantification. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec; 31(12):2301-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  12. Effects of acetabular rim trimming on hip joint contact pressures: how much is too much? Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep; 43(9):2138-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  13. Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs Rotator Cuff Classification to the Evaluation of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears and the Clinical Correlation With Outcome After Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov; 31(11):2145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  14. Rehabilitation Following Hip Arthroscopy - A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2015; 2:21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  15. Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  16. Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1199-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  17. Arthroscopic technique for the treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Feb; 4(1):e41-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  18. Endoscopic Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome of the Hip. JBJS Rev. 2014 Dec 09; 2(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  19. Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  20. Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Sep; 6(3):207-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  21. Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  22. Age-related differences in radiographic parameters for femoroacetabular impingement in hip arthroplasty patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  23. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  24. Hip pain in active patients: what you may be missing. J Fam Pract. 2012 Dec; 61(12):736-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  25. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for complete gluteus medius tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  26. Posterior hip pain in an athletic population: differential diagnosis and treatment options. Sports Health. 2010 May; 2(3):237-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  27. Hip Microfracture: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes. Cartilage. 2010 Apr; 1(2):127-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  28. Comparison of ultrasonic suture welding and traditional knot tying in a rabbit rotator cuff repair model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct; 15(5):630-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  29. The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  30. International trends in arthroscopic hip preservation surgery-are we treating the same patient? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Jan; 2(1):28-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  31. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2649-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  32. Shoulder pain in the overhead throwing athlete. Sports Health. 2009 Mar; 1(2):108-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  33. Postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jan; 17(1):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.