Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Charles Bush-Joseph and Brian Cole.
Charles Bush-Joseph
Connection Strength
2.456
Brian Cole
  1. Allograft reconstruction for extensor mechanism injuries. J Knee Surg. 2014 Dec; 27(6):489-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  2. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  3. Return to Sport and Performance After Microfracture in the Knees of National Basketball Association Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Nov; 1(6):2325967113512759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  4. Performance and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in X-Games Skiers and Snowboarders. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Nov; 1(6):2325967113511196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  5. Performance and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Male Major League Soccer Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Jul; 1(2):2325967113497189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  6. Midterm results of surgical treatment for adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov; 37 Suppl 1:125S-30S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  7. The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  8. Epinephrine-induced pulmonary edema during arthroscopic knee surgery. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May; 85(5):913-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  9. Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2023 03; 51(3):605-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  10. Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  11. Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative. Am J Sports Med. 2022 06; 50(7):1788-1797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  12. Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  13. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  14. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  15. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  16. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  17. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Associated Variables for Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3479-3486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  18. Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3447-3453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  19. Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011. J Orthop Res. 2021 02; 39(2):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  20. Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2020 10; 48(12):2978-2985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  21. Impact of Simulation Training on Diagnostic Arthroscopy Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov; 1(1):e47-e57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  22. Trapezoidal Achilles Tendon Allograft Plug for Revision Quadriceps Tendon Repair With a Large Tendon Defect. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Sep; 8(9):e1031-e1036.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  23. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  24. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  25. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  26. Utility of Modern Arthroscopic Simulator Training Models: A Meta-analysis and Updated Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1650-1677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  27. Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  28. Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep; 45(11):2586-2594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  29. Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  30. Do Clinical Results and Return-to-Sport Rates After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Differ Based on Graft Choice and Surgical Technique? Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Nov; 4(11):2325967116670142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  31. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: The Rush Experience. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Jan; 4(1):2325967115626876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  32. Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  33. Does Operative Treatment of First-Time Patellar Dislocations Lead to Increased Patellofemoral Stability? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1207-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  34. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  35. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  36. Closure of patellar tendon defect in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):329-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  37. Postoperative restoration of upper extremity motion and neuromuscular control during the overhand pitch: evaluation of tenodesis and repair for superior labral anterior-posterior tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec; 42(12):2825-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  38. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):364-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  39. Return to Pitching After Tommy John Surgery: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):NP40a-b.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  40. Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  41. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  42. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  43. Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jan; 2(1):2325967113518305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  44. Rate of return to pitching and performance after Tommy John surgery in Major League Baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar; 42(3):536-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  45. Utility of modern arthroscopic simulator training models. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jan; 30(1):121-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  46. Role of the superior labrum after biceps tenodesis in glenohumeral stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr; 23(4):485-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  47. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  48. Graft tensioning during knee ligament reconstruction: principles and practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Oct; 20(10):633-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  49. An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  50. The incidence of acute patellar tendon harvest complications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb; 24(2):162-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  51. Internal fixation of unstable Cahill Type-2C osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee in adolescent patients. Orthopedics. 2007 06; 30(6):487-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  52. Integration of arthroscopic and C-arm imaging into the arthroscopic image management system: technical note. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jan; 20(1):39-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  53. Comparison of ultrasonic suture welding and traditional knot tying in a rabbit rotator cuff repair model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct; 15(5):630-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  54. Outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of charges and perioperative complications. Am J Knee Surg. 2001; 14(3):145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.