Header Logo

Connection

Charles Bush-Joseph to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Bush-Joseph has written about Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.
Charles Bush-Joseph
Connection Strength
3.593
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
  1. Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2023 03; 51(3):605-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  2. Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  3. Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative. Am J Sports Med. 2022 06; 50(7):1788-1797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  4. Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  5. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  6. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  7. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  8. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  9. Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Jan-Feb; 29(1):36-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  10. Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2020 10; 48(12):2978-2985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  11. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  12. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  13. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  14. Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  15. Injuries to the Female Athlete in 2017: Part II: Upper and Lower-Extremity Injuries. JBJS Rev. 2017 10; 5(10):e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  16. Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep; 45(11):2586-2594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  17. Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  18. Comparison of screw post fixation and free bone block interference fixation for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts: biomechanical considerations. Arthroscopy. 1996 Aug; 12(4):470-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  19. Effect of tibial attachment location on the healing of the anterior cruciate ligament freeze model. J Orthop Res. 1996 Jul; 14(4):534-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  20. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  21. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  22. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  23. Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb; 33(2):284-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  24. Effects of graft rotation on initial biomechanical failure characteristics of bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct; 31(5):708-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  25. Comparison of clinical and dynamic knee function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb; 31(1):68-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  26. A prospective study of pain and analgesic use in outpatient endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1998 Sep; 14(6):613-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  27. Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):20-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  28. Single-incision endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Minimum two-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):30-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  29. Migration of femoral interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1998; 11(1):32-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  30. Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Surgery: What Is the Current State of Practice? Sports Health. 2018 Mar/Apr; 10(2):156-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  31. Functional adaptations in patients with ACL-deficient knees. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997; 25:1-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  32. Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  33. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  34. Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  35. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  36. The incidence of acute patellar tendon harvest complications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb; 24(2):162-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  37. Endoscopic single-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: surgical technique. 1992 [classical article]. J Knee Surg. 2003 Jul; 16(3):135-44; discussion 145-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  38. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: An outcome analysis comparing gender. Arthroscopy. 2001 Jul; 17(6):588-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  39. Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with Workers' Compensation claims. Arthroscopy. 2000 Jan-Feb; 16(1):49-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  40. Functional gait adaptations in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency over time. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar; (348):166-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  41. Cost containment: a charge comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1996 Apr; 12(2):160-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.