Header Logo

Connection

Bernard Bach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Bernard Bach has written about Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Bernard Bach
Connection Strength
14.030
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
  1. What Factors Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Allograft Tissue for ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct; 475(10):2412-2426.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.496
  2. Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2017 06; 5(6):e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.485
  3. Quality and Variability of Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols From Academic Orthopaedic Surgery Programs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1612-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.447
  4. Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years: How Do They Compare With Younger Patients? A Systematic Review and Comparison With Younger Populations. Sports Health. 2016 Mar-Apr; 8(2):177-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.444
  5. Risk Factors for Short-term Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar; 44(3):618-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  6. High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16; 97(18):1529-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.430
  7. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 May; 23(5):283-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  8. Economic Analyses in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative and Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2016 May; 44(5):1329-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  9. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.411
  10. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.410
  11. Closure of patellar tendon defect in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):329-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.406
  12. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):364-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  13. Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.399
  14. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.398
  15. Clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral suspensory fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Nov; 30(11):1491-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  16. Tips for successful transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2014 Oct; 27(5):331-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.395
  17. Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19; 96(4):292-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.386
  18. Regional mechanical properties of human patellar tendon allografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr; 23(4):961-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  19. 5 points on transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Jul; 42(7):305-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  20. Recognizing and managing complications in ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2013 Jun; 21(2):106-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.367
  21. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.364
  22. The biomechanical effects of 1.0 to 1.2 Mrad of ? irradiation on human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Apr; 41(4):835-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.359
  23. Articular and meniscal pathology associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2013 Jun; 26(3):185-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  24. Graft tensioning during knee ligament reconstruction: principles and practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Oct; 20(10):633-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  25. Interval arthrometric comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft: do grafts attenuate within the first year postoperatively? Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jun; 40(6):1347-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.338
  26. Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  27. Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  28. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  29. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation May Accelerate Allograft Ligamentization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2255-2264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  30. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  31. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  32. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  33. Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011. J Orthop Res. 2021 02; 39(2):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  34. Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2020 10; 48(12):2978-2985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  35. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  36. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  37. Length of Time Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Return to Sport Does Not Predict Need for Revision Surgery in National Football League Players. Arthroscopy. 2019 01; 35(1):158-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  38. Dynamic 3-Dimensional Mapping of Isometric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Is Anatomic Also Isometric? Arthroscopy. 2018 08; 34(8):2466-2475.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  39. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  40. Lateral Augmentation Procedures in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomic, Biomechanical, Imaging, and Clinical Evidence. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):740-752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  41. Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  42. Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep; 45(11):2586-2594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  43. Optimization of Anteromedial Portal Femoral Tunnel Drilling With Flexible and Straight Reamers in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A?Cadaveric 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography?Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1036-1043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  44. Growth Abnormalities Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Skeletally Immature Patient: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1714-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  45. Hamstring Activity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patient: Injury Implications and Comparison With Quadriceps Activity. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1651-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  46. Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2016 May 01; 39(3):e456-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  47. Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  48. Effect of tibial tunnel diameter on femoral tunnel placement in transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan; 24(1):51-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  49. The epidemiology of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Ontario, Canada. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2666-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  50. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct; 42(10):2363-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  51. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation and Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):1583-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  52. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  53. Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 02; 95(19):1751-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  54. Effect of reamer design on posteriorization of the tibial tunnel during endoscopic transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun; 41(6):1282-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  55. An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  56. Bony incorporation of soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament grafts in an animal model: autograft versus allograft with low-dose gamma irradiation. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug; 40(8):1789-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  57. Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.