Bernard Bach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Bernard Bach has written about Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.
Connection Strength
11.209
-
What Factors Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Allograft Tissue for ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct; 475(10):2412-2426.
Score: 0.485
-
Injuries to the Female Athlete in 2017: Part II: Upper and Lower-Extremity Injuries. JBJS Rev. 2017 10; 5(10):e5.
Score: 0.485
-
Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2017 06; 5(6):e1.
Score: 0.474
-
Dial Test: Unrecognized Predictor of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jul; 33(7):1375-1381.
Score: 0.467
-
Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years: How Do They Compare With Younger Patients? A Systematic Review and Comparison With Younger Populations. Sports Health. 2016 Mar-Apr; 8(2):177-81.
Score: 0.434
-
High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16; 97(18):1529-42.
Score: 0.421
-
Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
Score: 0.401
-
Articular and meniscal pathology associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2013 Jun; 26(3):185-93.
Score: 0.345
-
A comprehensive review of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan; 91(1):198-208.
Score: 0.264
-
Posterior wall blowout in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: avoidance, recognition, and salvage. J Knee Surg. 2008 Jul; 21(3):235-40.
Score: 0.255
-
ACL reconstruction: revisited, revised, reviewed. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jul; 17(3):125-6.
Score: 0.193
-
Adolescent ACL injury: treatment considerations. J Knee Surg. 2004 Apr; 17(2):79-93.
Score: 0.190
-
Effects of graft rotation on initial biomechanical failure characteristics of bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct; 31(5):708-13.
Score: 0.183
-
Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2023 03; 51(3):605-614.
Score: 0.176
-
Femoral aimer deformation: Potential cause for altered femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Arthroscopy. 2003 Feb; 19(2):E7.
Score: 0.175
-
Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
Score: 0.168
-
Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative. Am J Sports Med. 2022 06; 50(7):1788-1797.
Score: 0.167
-
Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
Score: 0.165
-
Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
Score: 0.165
-
Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autografts. Orthopedics. 2002 Mar; 25(3):343-57; quiz 358-9.
Score: 0.165
-
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation May Accelerate Allograft Ligamentization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2255-2264.
Score: 0.163
-
Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
Score: 0.161
-
The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
Score: 0.159
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. AORN J. 2001 Aug; 74(2):152-64; quiz 166-71, 173-4.
Score: 0.158
-
Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
Score: 0.158
-
Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2020 10; 48(12):2978-2985.
Score: 0.148
-
Does Bone Plug and Graft Orientation (Inferior Versus Posterior) Alter Native Femoral Footprint Coverage in Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1875-1881.
Score: 0.143
-
Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
Score: 0.137
-
Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
Score: 0.137
-
Length of Time Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Return to Sport Does Not Predict Need for Revision Surgery in National Football League Players. Arthroscopy. 2019 01; 35(1):158-162.
Score: 0.132
-
Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
Score: 0.127
-
Lateral Augmentation Procedures in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomic, Biomechanical, Imaging, and Clinical Evidence. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):740-752.
Score: 0.124
-
Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):20-9.
Score: 0.123
-
Single-incision endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Minimum two-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):30-40.
Score: 0.123
-
Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
Score: 0.123
-
Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep; 45(11):2586-2594.
Score: 0.119
-
Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
Score: 0.118
-
Functional adaptations in patients with ACL-deficient knees. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997; 25:1-20.
Score: 0.115
-
Hamstring Activity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patient: Injury Implications and Comparison With Quadriceps Activity. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1651-9.
Score: 0.109
-
Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2016 May 01; 39(3):e456-64.
Score: 0.109
-
Interference screw divergence in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1996 Feb; 12(1):45-9.
Score: 0.108
-
Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 May; 23(5):283-96.
Score: 0.102
-
Arthrometric results of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft patellar tendon substitution. Am J Sports Med. 1995 Mar-Apr; 23(2):179-85.
Score: 0.101
-
Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
Score: 0.100
-
Arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon substitution. Two- to four-year follow-up results. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Nov-Dec; 22(6):758-67.
Score: 0.099
-
Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
Score: 0.097
-
Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
Score: 0.097
-
Tips for successful transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2014 Oct; 27(5):331-42.
Score: 0.097
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
Score: 0.095
-
Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19; 96(4):292-300.
Score: 0.094
-
Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
Score: 0.094
-
Regional mechanical properties of human patellar tendon allografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr; 23(4):961-7.
Score: 0.093
-
A review of early anterior cruciate ligament surgical repair or reconstruction. Results and caveats. Orthop Rev. 1993 Nov; 22(11):1213-23.
Score: 0.092
-
Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 02; 95(19):1751-9.
Score: 0.092
-
Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Oct; 72(9):1299-306.
Score: 0.075
-
Avoiding mismatch in allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation between patient height and patellar tendon length. Arthroscopy. 2010 May; 26(5):643-50.
Score: 0.071
-
Systematic review of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a baseline assessment for consideration of double-bundle techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Oct; 36(10):2028-36.
Score: 0.065
-
Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs: care and prevention. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Feb; 36(2):379-94.
Score: 0.062
-
The incidence of acute patellar tendon harvest complications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb; 24(2):162-6.
Score: 0.062
-
Fresh-frozen allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007 Oct; 26(4):607-23.
Score: 0.061
-
An illustrated history of anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Knee Surg. 2007 Apr; 20(2):95-104.
Score: 0.059
-
Late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure by femoral bone plug dislodgement. Case report. J Knee Surg. 2006 Jul; 19(3):202-5.
Score: 0.056
-
Arthroscopic meniscal repair: analysis of treatment failures. J Knee Surg. 2005 Oct; 18(4):278-84.
Score: 0.053
-
Preliminary clinical results of two techniques for addressing graft tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2005 Jul; 18(3):183-91.
Score: 0.052
-
Displaced nonunion patellar fracture following use of a patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: case report. J Knee Surg. 2005 Apr; 18(2):131-4.
Score: 0.051
-
Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb; 33(2):284-92.
Score: 0.050
-
Development of an extensive patellar osteophyte following ACL reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jul; 17(3):172-4.
Score: 0.048
-
Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb; 31(1):2-11.
Score: 0.044
-
Comparison of clinical and dynamic knee function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb; 31(1):68-74.
Score: 0.044
-
Expert panel on anterior cruciate ligament case studies. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003 Jan; 34(1):183-202, x.
Score: 0.044
-
Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Jan-Feb; 29(1):36-41.
Score: 0.038
-
Special report: observations on interference screw morphologies. Arthroscopy. 2000 Jul; 16(5):E10.
Score: 0.037
-
A prospective study of pain and analgesic use in outpatient endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1998 Sep; 14(6):613-6.
Score: 0.032
-
Functional gait adaptations in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency over time. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar; (348):166-75.
Score: 0.031
-
Migration of femoral interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1998; 11(1):32-4.
Score: 0.031
-
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy, patella infera contracture syndrome, and loss of motion following anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Instr Course Lect. 1997; 46:251-60.
Score: 0.029
-
Comparison of screw post fixation and free bone block interference fixation for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts: biomechanical considerations. Arthroscopy. 1996 Aug; 12(4):470-3.
Score: 0.028
-
Clinical and functional outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the recreational athlete over the age of 35. Am J Knee Surg. 1996; 9(3):111-6.
Score: 0.027
-
Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
Score: 0.027
-
An unusual intrinsic complication of a patellar tendon allograft and recommendations for tissue banking. Arthroscopy. 1995 Aug; 11(4):475-7.
Score: 0.026
-
Effect of tibial tunnel diameter on femoral tunnel placement in transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan; 24(1):51-7.
Score: 0.025
-
Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct; 42(10):2363-70.
Score: 0.024
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation and Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):1583-91.
Score: 0.024
-
Meniscal tears: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Orthop Rev. 1992 Nov; 21(11):1311-7.
Score: 0.022
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: can anatomic femoral placement be achieved with a transtibial technique? Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 39(6):1306-15.
Score: 0.019
-
Can anatomic femoral tunnel placement be achieved using a transtibial technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 39(6):1263-9.
Score: 0.019
-
Endoscopic single-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: surgical technique. 1992 [classical article]. J Knee Surg. 2003 Jul; 16(3):135-44; discussion 145-7.
Score: 0.011
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar autograft tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 09; (402):53-63.
Score: 0.011
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: An outcome analysis comparing gender. Arthroscopy. 2001 Jul; 17(6):588-96.
Score: 0.010
-
Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with Workers' Compensation claims. Arthroscopy. 2000 Jan-Feb; 16(1):49-58.
Score: 0.009
-
Cost containment: a charge comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1996 Apr; 12(2):160-4.
Score: 0.007