Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Howard An and Edward Goldberg.
Connection Strength
2.267
-
Comparing outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in workman's versus non-workman's compensation population. Spine J. 2002 Nov-Dec; 2(6):408-14.
Score: 0.216
-
Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years. Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct; 15(5):945-952.
Score: 0.200
-
Risk Factors Associated With Development of Urinary Retention Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Special Attention to the Use of Glycopyrrolate in Anesthesia Reversal. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jan 15; 46(2):E133-E138.
Score: 0.190
-
Development and validation of a novel scoring tool for predicting facility discharge after elective posterior lumbar fusion. Spine J. 2020 10; 20(10):1629-1637.
Score: 0.179
-
Does the Duration of Cervical Radicular Symptoms Impact Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? Clin Spine Surg. 2019 11; 32(9):387-391.
Score: 0.175
-
Obesity does not impact clinical outcome but affects cervical sagittal alignment and adjacent segment degeneration in short term follow-up after an anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine J. 2019 07; 19(7):1146-1153.
Score: 0.168
-
The Duration of Symptoms Does Not Impact Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 03 01; 44(5):305-308.
Score: 0.167
-
Comparing Allografts to Autografts for Maintenance of Cervical Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Anterior Cervical Plating. Neurospine. 2019 Sep; 16(3):618-625.
Score: 0.167
-
Multi- versus single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing sagittal alignment, early adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2018 11; 27(11):2745-2753.
Score: 0.159
-
Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial. Spine J. 2012 May; 12(5):372-8.
Score: 0.103
-
Characterization of graft subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007 Aug; 36(8):421-7.
Score: 0.075
-
Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis. Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec; 5(6):615-22.
Score: 0.066
-
Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 01; 30(15):1756-61.
Score: 0.065
-
Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcome in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without direct uncovertebral joint decompression. Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec; 4(6):629-35.
Score: 0.062
-
Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec; 4(6):636-43.
Score: 0.062
-
Discovery of circulating blood biomarkers in patients with and without Modic changes of the lumbar spine: a preliminary analysis. Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar 07.
Score: 0.059
-
Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation. Spine J. 2003 Nov-Dec; 3(6):451-9.
Score: 0.058
-
Pediatric Back Pain: A Scoring System to Guide Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Feb 01; 42(2):116-122.
Score: 0.051
-
Cervical spine MRI phenotypes and prediction of pain, disability and adjacent segment degeneration/disease after ACDF. J Orthop Res. 2021 03; 39(3):657-670.
Score: 0.045