Header Logo

Connection

Howard An to Biomechanical Phenomena

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Howard An has written about Biomechanical Phenomena.
Connection Strength

2.358
  1. A biomechanical comparison of three different posterior fixation constructs used for c6-c7 cervical spine immobilization: a finite element study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014; 54(9):727-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  2. Effect of Lumbar Fusion and Pelvic Fixation Rigidity on Hip Joint Stress: A Finite Element Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Oct 15; 48(20):E355-E361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  3. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study. Eur Spine J. 2017 09; 26(9):2417-2424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  4. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20; 37(12):E696-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  5. Biomechanical effect of the C2 laminar decortication on the stability of C2 intralaminar screw construct and biomechanical comparison of C2 intralaminar screw and C2 pars screw. Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep; 69(1 Suppl Operative):ons1-6; discussion ons6-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  6. Biomechanical comparison of three different types of C7 fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 01; 36(5):393-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  7. Biomechanical and morphometric evaluation of occipital condyle for occipitocervical segmental fixation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011; 51(10):701-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  8. Problems related to cervical fusion: malalignment and nonunion. Instr Course Lect. 2009; 58:737-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  9. Intradiscal injections of osteogenic protein-1 restore the viscoelastic properties of degenerated intervertebral discs. Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec; 6(6):692-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  10. Intervertebral disc degeneration: biological and biomechanical factors. J Orthop Sci. 2006 Oct; 11(5):541-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  11. Motion preservation technologies: alternatives to spinal fusion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006 Sep; 35(9):411-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  12. Relevance of in vitro and in vivo models for intervertebral disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr; 88 Suppl 2:88-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  13. Anti-adhesion properties of a thrombin-based hemostatic gelatin in a canine laminectomy model: a biomechanical, biochemical, and histologic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 15; 31(4):E91-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  14. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15; 29(8):845-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Biomechanical evaluation of contemporary posterior spinal internal fixation configurations in an unstable burst-fracture calf spine model: special references of hook configurations and pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 01; 29(3):257-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  16. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  17. Effects of slip severity and loading directions on the stability of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a finite element model study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 01; 28(11):1103-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  18. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 15; 26(22):2498-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  19. A biomechanical comparison of modern anterior and posterior plate fixation of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 01; 26(1):15-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  20. Biomechanical effect of anterior grafting devices on the rotational stability of spinal constructs. J Spinal Disord. 2000 Apr; 13(2):150-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  21. The Kinematics and Spondylosis of the Lumbar Spine Vary Depending on the Levels of Motion Segments in Individuals With Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 01; 42(13):E767-E774.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  22. Biomechanics of transfixation in pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Oct 01; 21(19):2224-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  23. Effects of Axial Torsion on Disc Height Distribution: An In Vivo Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 05; 39(4):294-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  24. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Sep 15; 20(18):1979-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  25. Prediction of bone graft strength using dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Oct 15; 19(20):2358-62; discussion 2362-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  26. Relationship between biomechanical changes at adjacent segments and number of fused bone grafts in multilevel cervical fusions: a finite element investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jan; 20(1):22-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  27. Damage accumulation location under cyclic loading in the lumbar disc shifts from inner annulus lamellae to peripheral annulus with increasing disc degeneration. J Biomech. 2014 Jan 03; 47(1):24-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  28. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study. Spine J. 2013 Jun; 13(6):689-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  29. New treatments and imaging strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral disks. Radiology. 2012 Jul; 264(1):6-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  30. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  31. Corpectomy versus discectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spine pathology: a finite element model analysis. Spine J. 2012 May; 12(5):401-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  32. Progressive disc degeneration at C5-C6 segment affects the mechanics between disc heights and posterior facets above and below the degenerated segment: A flexion-extension investigation using a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model. Med Eng Phys. 2012 Jun; 34(5):552-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  33. Biomechanical effects of anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques on the stability of a multilevel cervical corpectomy construct: a finite element model analysis. Spine J. 2011 Apr; 11(4):324-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  34. Simulation of inhomogeneous rather than homogeneous poroelastic tissue material properties within disc annulus and nucleus better predicts cervical spine response: a C3-T1 finite element model analysis under compression and moment loadings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Feb 15; 36(4):E245-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  35. Relative contributions of strain-dependent permeability and fixed charged density of proteoglycans in predicting cervical disc biomechanics: a poroelastic C5-C6 finite element model study. Med Eng Phys. 2011 May; 33(4):438-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  36. Reduction in segmental flexibility because of disc degeneration is accompanied by higher changes in facet loads than changes in disc pressure: a poroelastic C5-C6 finite element investigation. Spine J. 2010 Dec; 10(12):1069-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  37. Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the craniovertebral junction in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 01; 35(23):E1278-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  38. Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 15; 35(22):E1160-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  39. Patterns of height changes in anterior and posterior cervical disc regions affects the contact loading at posterior facets during moderate and severe disc degeneration: a poroelastic C5-C6 finite element model study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15; 35(18):E873-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  40. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20; 35(9):939-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  41. In vivo segmental motion of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis patients with atlantoaxial subluxation. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008 May-Jun; 26(3):442-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  42. Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jun 01; 29(11):E212-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  43. Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 15; 26(8):876-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  44. Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion. J Spinal Disord. 2001 Feb; 14(1):17-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  45. Anterior cervical fusion: a finite element model study on motion segment stability including the effect of osteoporosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 15; 25(8):955-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  46. Flexibility of lumbar spinal motion segments correlated to type of tears in the annulus fibrosus. J Neurosurg. 2000 Jan; 92(1 Suppl):81-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  47. The stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments with a high-intensity zone in the anulus fibrosus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Oct 15; 23(20):2167-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  48. Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996 Oct; 17(9):1605-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  49. Prediction of fatigue screw loosening in anterior spinal fixation using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Dec 01; 20(23):2565-8; discussion 2569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  50. Strength of anterior vertebral screw fixation in relationship to bone mineral density. J Spinal Disord. 1995 Apr; 8(2):121-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.