Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Benedict Nwachukwu and Shane Nho.
Benedict Nwachukwu
Connection Strength
11.645
Shane Nho
  1. Surgical Treatment of Labral Tears: Debridement, Repair, and Reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):e1-e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.753
  2. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.721
  3. Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):901-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  4. Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):415-423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.693
  5. Preoperative Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul; 7(7):2325967119860079.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.674
  6. How Should We Define Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement on the iHOT-12? HSS J. 2019 Jul; 15(2):103-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.642
  7. External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2022 11; 50(13):3593-3599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  8. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):2090-2105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  9. Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Surgery: Predictors and Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov; 9(11):23259671211038933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  10. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test Is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec; 3(6):e1645-e1650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  11. Superior Gluteal Reconstruction Results in Promising Outcomes for Massive Abductor Tendon Tears. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 3(5):e1321-e1327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  12. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  13. Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2457-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  14. Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia Affect Return to Sport in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug; 3(4):e1087-e1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  15. Repeat Revision Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Match?That of Initial Revision But Not That of Primary Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3434-3441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  16. Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  17. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1833-1842.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  18. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  19. Endoscopic Approach to Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Repair. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Oct-Dec; 10(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  20. Standardizing Muscle Strength Measurement in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Response. Sports Health. 2021 Jul-Aug; 13(4):404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  21. Surgical Treatment of Subchondral Bone Cysts of the Acetabulum With Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Material in Patients Without Advanced Arthritic Hips. Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Sep; 9(9):e1375-e1379.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  22. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 08; 48(10):NP45-NP46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  23. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 06; 48(7):1616-1624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  24. Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  25. Travel Distance Does Not Affect Outcomes in Hip Preservation Surgery: A Case for Centers of Excellence. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar; 8(3):2325967120908821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  26. The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  27. Case (and capsule) closed! Can we really claim that capsular repair may not influence outcomes after hip arthroscopy? Hip Int. 2020 05; 30(3):363-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  28. Evaluation of Statistical Shape Modeling in Quantifying Femoral Morphologic Differences Between Symptomatic and Nonsymptomatic Hips in Patients with Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr; 2(2):e91-e95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  29. 1.5?T magnetic resonance imaging generates accurate 3D proximal femoral models: Surgical planning implications for femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2020 09; 38(9):2050-2056.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  30. What is the Role of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing in Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr; 2(2):e97-e104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  31. Timing of Surgery: Can It Predict Outcome? Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):NP11-NP12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  32. Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1022-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  33. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):403-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  34. Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  35. Comparing Outcomes of Competitive Athletes Versus Nonathletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):159-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  36. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  37. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3141-3147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  38. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  39. Superior Gluteal Reconstruction for Severe Hip Abductor Deficiency. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Oct; 8(10):e1255-e1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  40. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  41. Mirror Image Modeling of Acetabular Rim Thickness Differences in Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov; 1(1):e1-e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  42. Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  43. Early Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Provides Superior Outcomes When Compared With Delaying Surgical Treatment Beyond 6 Months. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2038-2044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  44. Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  45. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  46. Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1101-1108.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  47. Effect of Capsular Closure After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Achieving Clinically Meaningful Outcomes: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Comparative Studies. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun; 9(6):23259671211017467.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  48. Author Reply to "Placebo Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery" and "Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials". Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2779-2784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  49. Preparation Methods and Clinical Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Intra-articular Hip Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Oct; 8(10):2325967120960414.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  50. Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals Are Associated With Higher Altmetric Attention Scores and Social Media Attention Than Nonorthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1261-1270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  51. Sham Surgery Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery May Just Be a Sham: A Systematic Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2750-2762.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  52. What Is the Predictive Ability and Academic Impact of the Altmetrics Score and Social Media Attention? Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1056-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.