Header Logo

Connection

Arash Sayari to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arash Sayari has written about Humans.
Arash Sayari
Connection Strength
0.385
Humans
  1. Duration of Symptoms Does Not Affect Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Arthrodesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2021 03 01; 34(2):E72-E79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  2. Device solutions for a challenging spine surgery: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 04; 16(4):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  3. The Veterans Rand-12 Physical Composite Score Prognosticates Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec; 180:e756-e764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  4. Poor patient-reported mental health correlates with inferior patient-reported outcome measures following cervical disc replacement. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 11; 165(11):3511-3519.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  5. Effect of baseline veterans RAND-12 physical composite score on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 11; 165(11):3531-3537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  6. Time to achievement of minimum clinically important difference after lumbar decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 09; 165(9):2625-2631.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  7. Preoperative predictors of prolonged hospitalization in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 09; 165(9):2615-2624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  8. Postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus LLIF for adjacent segment disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 07; 165(7):1907-1914.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  9. Differences in Time to Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference Between Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement. World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug; 176:e337-e344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  10. Depressed patients with greater symptom duration before MIS-TLIF do not report inferior outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 07; 165(7):1923-1929.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  11. Understanding the Impact of Early Depressive Burden on Patient Perceptions of Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement. World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul; 175:e1175-e1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  12. Perioperative Predictors in Patients Undergoing Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement. World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul; 175:e914-e924.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Influence of Prolonged Duration of Symptoms Before MIS-TLIF in a Workers' Compensation Population. World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul; 175:e439-e446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  14. Establishing Minimum Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for Physical Function and Pain in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul; 175:e352-e360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  15. Impact of body mass index on PROMIS outcomes following lumbar decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 06; 165(6):1427-1434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  16. Does Symptom Duration Prior to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Disc Herniation Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Workers' Compensation Population? World Neurosurg. 2023 May; 173:e748-e754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  17. Resorption of Lumbar Disk Herniation: Mechanisms, Clinical Predictors, and Future Directions. JBJS Rev. 2023 01 01; 11(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  18. Influence of Preoperative Disability on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2023 Mar; 171:e412-e421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  19. Answer to the letter to the editor by Zhi-Hui Dai concerning "Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion" by Rudisill SS et al. (Eur Spine J [2022]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07238-3). Eur Spine J. 2022 11; 31(11):3161-3162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J. 2022 08; 31(8):2104-2114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  21. Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-Level and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Spine Surg. 2022 05 01; 35(4):155-165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  22. Endplate abnormalities, Modic changes and their relationship to alignment parameters and surgical outcomes in the cervical spine. J Orthop Res. 2023 01; 41(1):206-214.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  23. Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility. Eur Spine J. 2022 08; 31(8):2057-2081.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  24. Pediatric Back Pain: A Scoring System to Guide Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Feb 01; 42(2):116-122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  25. Artificial intelligence predicts disk re-herniation following lumbar microdiscectomy: development of the "RAD" risk profile. Eur Spine J. 2021 08; 30(8):2167-2175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  26. The Modic-endplate-complex phenotype in cervical spine patients: Association with symptoms and outcomes. J Orthop Res. 2022 Feb; 40(2):449-459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  27. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function in MIS TLIF: 2-Year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Nov 15; 45(22):E1516-E1522.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  28. Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma to the Spine and the Extremities: Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Treatment. JBJS Rev. 2019 09; 7(9):e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.