Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Joshua Jacobs and Hannah Lundberg.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
1.333 |
|
|
|
-
Mell SP, Wimmer MA, Jacobs JJ, Lundberg HJ. Optimal surgical component alignment minimizes TKR wear - An in silico study with nine alignment parameters. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 01; 125:104939.
Score: 0.224
-
Gustafson JA, Pourzal R, Levine BR, Jacobs JJ, Lundberg HJ. Corrigenda. Bone Joint J. 2021 Aug; 103-B(8):1438.
Score: 0.220
-
Gustafson JA, Pourzal R, Levine BR, Jacobs JJ, Lundberg HJ. Modelling changes in modular taper micromechanics due to surgeon assembly technique in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul; 102-B(7_Supple_B):33-40.
Score: 0.204
-
Knowlton CB, Lundberg HJ, Wimmer MA, Jacobs JJ. Can a gait-dependent model predict wear on retrieved total knee arthroplasty components? Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):129-137.
Score: 0.203
-
Pourzal R, Lundberg HJ, Hall DJ, Jacobs JJ. What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2707-2711.
Score: 0.174
-
Pourzal R, Hall DJ, Ha NQ, Urban RM, Levine BR, Jacobs JJ, Lundberg HJ. Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42.
Score: 0.157
-
McCarthy SM, Hall DJ, Mathew MT, Jacobs JJ, Lundberg HJ, Pourzal R. Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 09 01; 479(9):2083-2096.
Score: 0.055
-
Royhman D, Pourzal R, Hall D, Lundberg HJ, Wimmer MA, Jacobs J, Hallab NJ, Mathew MT. Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 06; 118:104443.
Score: 0.054
-
Hall DJ, Pourzal R, Lundberg HJ, Mathew MT, Jacobs JJ, Urban RM. Mechanical, chemical and biological damage modes within head-neck tapers of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V contemporary hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 07; 106(5):1672-1685.
Score: 0.042
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|