 Peer Review, Research
"Peer Review, Research" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.
| Descriptor ID |
D017712
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549.700 H01.770.644.487 I01.880.604.640.700 L01.737.640 N03.706.700.700
|
| Concept/Terms |
Peer Review, Research- Peer Review, Research
- Peer Reviews, Research
- Research Peer Review
- Research Peer Reviews
- Review, Research Peer
- Reviews, Research Peer
Peer Review, Publishing- Peer Review, Publishing
- Peer Reviews, Publishing
- Publishing Peer Review
- Publishing Peer Reviews
- Review, Publishing Peer
- Reviews, Publishing Peer
Peer Review, Grants- Peer Review, Grants
- Grants Peer Review
- Grants Peer Reviews
- Peer Reviews, Grants
- Review, Grants Peer
- Reviews, Grants Peer
- Grants, Peer Review
- Grant, Peer Review
- Peer Review Grant
- Peer Review Grants
- Review Grant, Peer
- Review Grants, Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review, Research".
- Psychiatry and Psychology [F]
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms [F01]
- Psychology, Social [F01.829]
- Group Processes [F01.829.316]
- Peer Review [F01.829.316.549]
- Peer Review, Research [F01.829.316.549.700]
- Natural Sciences [H]
- Natural Science Disciplines [H01]
- Science [H01.770]
- Research [H01.770.644]
- Peer Review, Research [H01.770.644.487]
- Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena [I]
- Social Sciences [I01]
- Sociology [I01.880]
- Social Control, Formal [I01.880.604]
- Peer Review [I01.880.604.640]
- Peer Review, Research [I01.880.604.640.700]
- Information Science [L]
- Information Science [L01]
- Publishing [L01.737]
- Peer Review, Research [L01.737.640]
- Health Care [N]
- Health Care Economics and Organizations [N03]
- Social Control, Formal [N03.706]
- Peer Review [N03.706.700]
- Peer Review, Research [N03.706.700.700]
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review, Research".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review, Research" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review, Research" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2006 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2010 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | | 2015 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review, Research" by people in Profiles.
-
Buchman TG, Bleck TP, Busl KM, Dellinger RP, Deutschman CS, Kadri SS, Marshall JC, Maslove DM, Masur H, Osborn TM, Parker MM, Rochwerg B, Sarwal A, Sevransky JE, Thiagarajan RR. Error, Fraud, and Responsibility. Crit Care Med. 2023 09 01; 51(9):1105-1107.
-
Wright-Chisem J, Cohn MR, Yang J, Osei D, Kogan M. Do Medical Students Who Participate in a Research Gap Year Produce More Research During Residency? J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 05 13; 5(5).
-
Khan MS, Shaikh A, Ochani RK, Akhtar T, Fatima K, Khan SU, Mookadam F, Murad MH, Figueredo VM, Doukky R, Krasuski RA. Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 05; 12(5):e005260.
-
DeCoursey TE. Publishing: Double-blind peer review a double risk. Nature. 2015 Apr 30; 520(7549):623.
-
de Oliveira GS, Akikwala T, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, Sullivan JT, Zell C, McCarthy RJ. Factors affecting admission to anesthesiology residency in the United States: choosing the future of our specialty. Anesthesiology. 2012 Aug; 117(2):243-51.
-
De Oliveira GS, Chang R, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature. Anesth Analg. 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8.
-
Shattell MM, Chinn P, Thomas SP, Cowling WR. Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Mar; 42(1):58-65.
-
DeCoursey TE. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings. Nature. 2006 Feb 16; 439(7078):784.
-
Leopold SS, Warme WJ, Fritz Braunlich E, Shott S. Association between funding source and study outcome in orthopaedic research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Oct; (415):293-301.
-
Fardon DF, Garfin SR, Saal JA. Intimidation of researchers by special-interest groups. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 30; 337(18):1315-6.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|