Header Logo

Connection

Shane Nho to Treatment Outcome

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Shane Nho has written about Treatment Outcome.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
7.914
Treatment Outcome
  1. Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2023 08; 51(10):2540-2550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  2. Use and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2023 07; 51(8):2141-2150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  3. Patients Maintain Clinically Significant Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1869-1881.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  4. Capsular Repair Is Associated With Lower Revision Rates Yet Similar Clinical Outcomes and Arthroplasty Conversion 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1882-1891.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  5. Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023 06; 51(7):1818-1825.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  6. Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Experience Worse Mid-Term Outcomes but Similar Return-to-Work: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2023 11; 39(11):2293-2299.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  7. Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Index Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures Predict Contralateral Surgery Results at 2 Years. Arthroscopy. 2023 05; 39(5):1175-1182.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  8. Borderline Dysplastic Hips Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Achieve Equivalent Patient Reported Outcomes When Compared With Hips With Normal Acetabular Coverage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar 15; 31(6):e336-e346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  9. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2629-2636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  10. Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Hips With Mild Osteoarthritis (T?nnis Grade 1): A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2598-2605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  11. Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Pain on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2606-2612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  12. Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(8):2155-2164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  13. Presence of a Posterior Wall Sign in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2022 08; 37(8):1520-1525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  14. Association Between Preoperative Patient Factors and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Machine Learning Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar; 50(3):746-756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  15. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):2090-2105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  16. Return to Sport in Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2022 01; 50(1):30-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  17. Patients With a High Femoroepiphyseal Roof With Concomitant Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Do Not Demonstrate Inferior Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2022 05; 38(5):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  18. The Natural Course of Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement According to the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 and Hip Outcome Score Sports Subscale. Am J Sports Med. 2021 10; 49(12):3250-3260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  19. Multicenter Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of 2-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair Versus Labral Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2021 09; 49(11):2968-2976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  20. High rate of return to tennis after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  21. Association Between Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion and Propensity for Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2466-2474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  22. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  23. Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2457-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  24. Use of Younger Patient Age and Greater Anterior Center-Edge Angle to Predict the Need for Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement-Related Hip Pain. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(8):2110-2116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  25. Multicenter Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Two-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair, Segmental Labral Reconstruction, or Circumferential Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  26. Repeat Revision Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Match?That of Initial Revision But Not That of Primary Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3434-3441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  27. Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  28. Achievement of Meaningful Clinical Outcomes Is Unaffected by Capsulotomy Type During Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip (MASH) Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):713-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  29. High Rate of Full Duty Return to Work After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Workers Who Are Not on Workers' Compensation. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):729-736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  30. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1833-1842.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  31. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  32. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1467-1473.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  33. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1143-1151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  34. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Five-Year Results in 140 Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021 01; 49(1):90-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  35. Improvements in Sleep Quality Are Maintained at a Minimum of 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  36. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  37. Editorial Commentary: Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: What We Know Now and Where Do We Go From Here? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1862-1863.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  38. Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  39. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 06; 48(7):1616-1624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  40. Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):901-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  41. Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  42. Timing of Surgery: Can It Predict Outcome? Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):NP11-NP12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  43. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):403-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  44. Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):415-423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  45. Comparing Outcomes of Competitive Athletes Versus Nonathletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):159-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  46. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  47. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3141-3147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  48. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  49. Radiographic Prevalence of Sacroiliac Joint Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2598-2605.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  50. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2626-2635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  51. Early Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Provides Superior Outcomes When Compared With Delaying Surgical Treatment Beyond 6 Months. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2038-2044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  52. Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  53. Radiographic Prevalence of Symphysis Pubis Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 05; 47(6):1467-1472.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  54. Influence of Cigarette Smoking at the Time of Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched-Pair Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1138-1144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  55. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  56. Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum 2 Years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):552-559.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  57. Preoperative Symptom Duration Is Associated With Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):131-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  58. Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Regardless of Gender. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct; 38(9):465-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  59. Antegrade Femoral Nail Distal Interlocking Screw Causing Rupture of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Patellar Instability. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jul; 47(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  60. The Importance of Comprehensive Cam Correction: Radiographic Parameters Are Predictive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2018 07; 46(9):2072-2078.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  61. High Rate of Return to Swimming After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1471-1477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  62. The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix at the Time of Gluteus Medius Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):832-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  63. Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 02; 46(2):288-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  64. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral or Bilateral Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov; 45(13):3044-3051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  65. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Capsular Plication for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug; 45(10):2303-2311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  66. Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2116-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  67. Hip Arthroscopy for Atypical Posterior Hip Pain: A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun; 45(7):1627-1632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  68. Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Arthroscopy. 2016 09; 32(9):1877-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  69. Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18; 98(10):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  70. Complications in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Strategies for Prevention. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015 Dec; 23(4):187-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  71. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  72. Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  73. Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  74. The use of manual therapy post-hip arthroscopy when an exercise-based therapy approach has failed: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep; 44(9):712-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  75. Isolated vastus lateralis tendon avulsion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Oct; 42(10):464-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  76. Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  77. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears combined with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec; 26(12):1667-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  78. Incidence of early development of radiolucent lines in keeled polyethylene glenoid components after total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):333-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  79. Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):764-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  80. Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan; 38(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  81. Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration. Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov; 25(11):1319-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  82. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective evaluation with sequential ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct; 37(10):1938-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  83. Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy. 2009 Jul; 25(7):788-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  84. Association of Changes in Hip and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Squat With Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2023 11; 51(13):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  85. External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2022 11; 50(13):3593-3599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  86. Relationship of Average Outcomes Scores and Change in Status Requires Further Interpretation Between 1 and 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2022 10; 50(12):3184-3189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  87. A Single Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):325-331.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  88. Tenotomy for Iliopsoas Pathology is Infrequently Performed and Associated with Poorer Outcomes in Hips Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2140-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  89. Large Heterogeneity Among Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reporting Trends and Quantification Methods. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):1028-1037.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  90. Defining Variations in Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1175-1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  91. Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2338-2345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  92. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2064-2069.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  93. Surgical Treatment of Septic Shoulders: A Comparison Between Arthrotomy and Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):1984-1991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  94. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1457-1462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  95. There Is a Significant Discrepancy Between "Big Data" Database and Original Research Publications on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1998-2004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  96. Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):844-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  97. Variability and Comprehensiveness of North American Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov; 33(11):1998-2005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  98. Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What Are We Seeing in the Office, and Who Are We Choosing to Treat? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  99. Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct; 44(10):2505-2517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  100. Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  101. Proximal humerus fracture after keyhole biceps tenodesis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):E61-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  102. Early return to work in workers' compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug; 26(8):1027-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  103. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Jun; 18(2):113-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  104. Outcomes of mechanical debridement and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chondral defects: a prospective randomized study. J Knee Surg. 2008 Apr; 21(2):116-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.