Header Logo

Connection

Shane Nho to Acetabulum

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Shane Nho has written about Acetabulum.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
8.180
Acetabulum
  1. The Effect of Rim Preparation, Labral Augmentation, and Labral Reconstruction on the Suction Seal of the Hip. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):365-373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.657
  2. Surgical Treatment of Labral Tears: Debridement, Repair, and Reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):e1-e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.649
  3. Author Reply to "Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum'". Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2947-2948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.638
  4. Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2433-2442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.616
  5. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.568
  6. Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2116-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.497
  7. Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar; 32(3):468-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.448
  8. Effects of acetabular rim trimming on hip joint contact pressures: how much is too much? Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep; 43(9):2138-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.439
  9. Labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autografts and semitendinosus allografts improves hip joint contact area and contact pressure: an in vitro analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan; 43(1):98-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.418
  10. Computed tomographic analysis of curved and straight guides for placement of suture anchors for acetabular labral refixation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct; 29(10):1623-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  11. Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):358-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  12. Hip osseous morphology using computer navigation and plain radiographs. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Nov; 41(11):519-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.364
  13. New radiographic parameters to describe anterior acetabular rim trimming during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1404-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.354
  14. Approach to the Patient With Failed Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears and Femoroacetabular Impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 01; 28(13):538-545.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  15. Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Analyses Show Similarities in Anterosuperior Acetabular Coverage Between Acetabular Dysplasia and Borderline Dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2623-2632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  16. Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  17. Three-dimensional hip joint congruity evaluation of the borderline dysplasia: Zonal-acetabular radius of curvature. J Orthop Res. 2020 10; 38(10):2197-2205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  18. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  19. Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2338-2345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  20. Editorial Commentary: What Irks a Hip Arthroscopist? Intraoperative Anchor Failure. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1217-1218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  21. Variability and Comprehensiveness of North American Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov; 33(11):1998-2005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  22. Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsulotomy, Capsulectomy, and Capsular Repair on Hip Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug; 31(8):1511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  23. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2649-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  24. Operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep; 42(3):112-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  25. The use of manual therapy post-hip arthroscopy when an exercise-based therapy approach has failed: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep; 44(9):712-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  26. Protrusio acetabuli: new insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep; 467(9):2241-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  27. Criteria for the Operating Room Confirmation of the Diagnosis of Hip Instability: The Results of an International Expert Consensus Conference. Arthroscopy. 2022 10; 38(10):2837-2849.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  28. The Role of Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: History, Current Practices, and Future Applications. JBJS Rev. 2021 08 20; 9(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  29. Hip Instability in Ballet Dancers: A Narrative Review. J Dance Med Sci. 2021 Sep 15; 25(3):176-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.