Header Logo

Connection

Stanley Sheft to Adult

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Stanley Sheft has written about Adult.
Connection Strength

0.411
  1. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 10 26; 61(10):2578-2588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  2. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jun; 26(6):572-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  3. The effects of marker-related temporal cues on auditory gap-duration discrimination. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jan; 75(1):121-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  4. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception. Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec; 33(6):709-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  5. Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul; 124(1):562-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  6. Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May; 117(5):3054-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  7. Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners. Am J Audiol. 2020 Sep 18; 29(3S):577-590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  8. Top-Down Modulation of Auditory-Motor Integration during Speech Production: The Role of Working Memory. J Neurosci. 2017 10 25; 37(43):10323-10333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  9. Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0167030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  10. The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan; 139(1):455-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  11. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb; 137(2):745-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  12. Effects of noise reduction on AM perception for hearing-impaired listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Oct; 15(5):839-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Reliability measure of a clinical test: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI). J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Nov-Dec; 24(10):969-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Effects of noise reduction on AM and FM perception. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Feb; 14(1):149-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  15. The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun; 16(2):83-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  16. Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct; 130(4):2076-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  17. Perception of interrupted speech: cross-rate variation in the intelligibility of gated and concatenated sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL108-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  18. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  19. Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2010 Nov; 49(11):823-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  20. Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2158-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.