Header Logo

Connection

Stanley Sheft to Speech Perception

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Stanley Sheft has written about Speech Perception.
Connection Strength

2.914
  1. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 10 26; 61(10):2578-2588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.584
  2. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jun; 26(6):572-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.461
  3. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception. Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec; 33(6):709-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.385
  4. Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul; 124(1):562-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.285
  5. Discrimination of starting phase with sinusoidal envelope modulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb; 121(2):EL84-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.259
  6. Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners. Am J Audiol. 2020 Sep 18; 29(3S):577-590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  7. Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0167030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  8. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb; 137(2):745-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  9. The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun; 16(2):83-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  10. Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct; 130(4):2076-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  11. Perception of interrupted speech: cross-rate variation in the intelligibility of gated and concatenated sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL108-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  12. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  13. Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2010 Nov; 49(11):823-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  14. Top-Down Modulation of Auditory-Motor Integration during Speech Production: The Role of Working Memory. J Neurosci. 2017 10 25; 37(43):10323-10333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  15. The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan; 139(1):455-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  16. Effects of noise reduction on AM and FM perception. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Feb; 14(1):149-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.