Scott Sporer to Treatment Outcome
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott Sporer has written about Treatment Outcome.
Connection Strength
0.728
-
The effect of payer type on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):295-8.
Score: 0.056
-
Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
Score: 0.055
-
Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):87-90.
Score: 0.035
-
The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:92-9.
Score: 0.034
-
Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. Instr Course Lect. 2006; 55:287-97.
Score: 0.033
-
The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec; 441:216-20.
Score: 0.033
-
The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr; 87(4):760-5.
Score: 0.032
-
Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):227-31.
Score: 0.031
-
Primary total hip arthroplasty using a modular proximally coated prosthesis in patients older than 70: two to eight year results. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Feb; 19(2):197-203.
Score: 0.029
-
Modern Description of Antibiotic Spacer Options for PJI in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Infection Eradication Rates. J Arthroplasty. 2023 06; 38(6S):S318-S325.
Score: 0.028
-
Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Tibial Revision With Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7):2536-2540.
Score: 0.024
-
Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for Treatment of the Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 06; 36(6):2171-2177.
Score: 0.024
-
A Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for the Treatment of Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 06; 102(9):778-787.
Score: 0.023
-
Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 05; 35(5):1402-1406.
Score: 0.022
-
Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2018 02; 33(2):362-365.
Score: 0.019
-
Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
Score: 0.017
-
Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
Score: 0.017
-
The Use of Structural Distal Femoral Allograft for Acetabular Reconstruction of Paprosky Type IIIA Defects at a Mean 21 Years of Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):680-3.
Score: 0.016
-
The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):90-3.
Score: 0.016
-
Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction for extensor mechanism failure following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 18; 97(4):279-83.
Score: 0.016
-
Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):229-31.
Score: 0.015
-
Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
Score: 0.015
-
The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
Score: 0.015
-
Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
Score: 0.014
-
Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
Score: 0.013
-
Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
Score: 0.013
-
Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401.
Score: 0.013
-
What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):1002-8.
Score: 0.012
-
Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17; 92(16):2737-52.
Score: 0.012
-
A prospective randomized trial of mini-incision posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec; 468(12):3348-54.
Score: 0.011
-
Newer anesthesia and rehabilitation protocols enable outpatient hip replacement in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun; 467(6):1424-30.
Score: 0.010
-
Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
Score: 0.010
-
The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Comparison of simultaneous bilateral with unilateral total knee arthroplasty in terms of perioperative complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct; 85(10):1981-6.
Score: 0.007