Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Anthony Romeo and Joseph Liu.
Connection Strength
2.460
-
Prediction of total healthcare cost following total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing machine learning. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Dec; 31(12):2449-2456.
Score: 0.206
-
Assessment and Trends in the Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles in Shoulder Instability. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Dec; 8(12):2325967120967082.
Score: 0.183
-
Efficacy of the modified Frailty Index and the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index in predicting complications in patients undergoing operative management of proximal humerus fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Mar; 30(3):658-667.
Score: 0.178
-
Response to Chelli and Boileau: "Let's 'recall' sensitivity and specificity". J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar; 29(3):e100-e102.
Score: 0.174
-
Construct validation of machine learning in the prediction of short-term postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Dec; 28(12):e410-e421.
Score: 0.167
-
Analysis of Return to Sport and Weight Training After Repair of the Pectoralis Major Tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2151-2157.
Score: 0.166
-
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: a more complex episode of care than for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov; 28(11):2139-2146.
Score: 0.166
-
Return to Sport Following Hemiarthroplasty With Concentric Reaming Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched Pair Analysis. Orthopedics. 2019 Sep 01; 42(5):276-284.
Score: 0.166
-
Figure-of-eight Reconstruction of the Sternoclavicular Joint: Outcomes of Sport and Work. Orthopedics. 2019 Jul 01; 42(4):205-210.
Score: 0.165
-
Comparative analysis of work-related outcomes in hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming and total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb; 28(2):244-251.
Score: 0.157
-
Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Over-the-Top Rotator Cuff Repair Incorporation for Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2018 Aug; 7(8):e829-e837.
Score: 0.155
-
Double-Row Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair: A?Surgical Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2018 Aug; 7(8):e805-e809.
Score: 0.155
-
High Rate of Return to Work by 3 Months Following Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability. Arthroscopy. 2022 03; 38(3):684-691.
Score: 0.048
-
Predicting Patient Satisfaction With Maximal Outcome Improvement After Biceps Tenodesis. Orthopedics. 2021 May-Jun; 44(3):e359-e366.
Score: 0.047
-
Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3447-3453.
Score: 0.045
-
Preoperative Mental Health Scores and Achieving Patient Acceptable Symptom State Are Predictive of Return to Work After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Oct; 7(10):2325967119878415.
Score: 0.042
-
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov; 28(11):2238-2246.
Score: 0.042
-
Predictive Factors and the Duration to Pre-Injury Work Status Following Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1026-1033.
Score: 0.041
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of the Asymptomatic Elbow Predict Injuries and Surgery in Major League Baseball Pitchers. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jan; 7(1):2325967118818413.
Score: 0.040
-
Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May; 28(5):939-948.
Score: 0.040
-
The Shoulder Self-Administered Motion Evaluation Has Excellent Patient Reliability and Reproducibility on Both Physician and Repeat Follow-up Testing. Orthopedics. 2018 Nov 01; 41(6):e820-e826.
Score: 0.039
-
Establishing maximal medical improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep; 27(9):1711-1720.
Score: 0.038