Header Logo

Connection

Brian Forsythe to Patient Reported Outcome Measures

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Forsythe has written about Patient Reported Outcome Measures.
  1. Patient Satisfaction After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2020 Nov 01; 43(6):e492-e497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.560
  2. Relationship between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing and legacy instruments in patients undergoing isolated biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun; 29(6):1214-1222.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.541
  3. How Should We Define Clinically Significant Improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test for Patients Undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery? Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):241-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.536
  4. PROMIS Upper Extremity underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing primary rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Apr; 31(4):718-725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  5. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1731-1739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  6. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  7. Preoperative Opioid Use Predicts Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use and Inferior Patient Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2681-2688.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  8. Influence of mental health on postoperative outcomes in patients following biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov; 29(11):2248-2256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  9. Perioperative Opioid Use Predicts Postoperative Opioid Use and Inferior Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2645-2654.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  10. How Is Maximum Outcome Improvement Defined in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy for Rotator Cuff Repair? A 1-Year Follow-Up Study. Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1805-1810.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  11. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments Correlate Better With Legacy Measures in Knee Cartilage Patients at Postoperative Than at Preoperative Assessment. Arthroscopy. 2020 05; 36(5):1419-1428.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  12. The Impact of Workers' Compensation on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity and Legacy Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 10; 35(10):2817-2824.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  13. Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors for Instability Recurrence in a Young, Active Patient Population. Arthroscopy. 2019 10; 35(10):2909-2915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  14. Predictive Factors and the Duration to Pre-Injury Work Status Following Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1026-1033.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  15. Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Apr; 28(4):639-647.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  16. Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2501-2509.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  17. The lack of standardized outcome measures following lower extremity injury in elite soccer: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct; 26(10):3109-3117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  18. PROMIS physical function and pain perform poorly psychometrically in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov; 31(11):5067-5076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  19. Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair May Result in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes but Similar Failure Rates Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique. Arthroscopy. 2023 06; 39(6):1483-1489.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  20. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  21. Establishing clinically significant outcomes of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity questionnaire after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct; 30(10):2231-2239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  22. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 02; 37(2):600-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  23. Bony Ingrowth of Coil-Type Open-Architecture Anchors Compared With Screw-Type PEEK Anchors for the Medial Row in Rotator Cuff Repair: A?Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):952-961.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  24. Factors Associated With Clinically Significant Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1567-1575.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  25. Establishing maximal medical improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep; 27(9):1711-1720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  26. Establishing Maximal Medical Improvement After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(4):1000-1007.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.