Header Logo

Connection

Brian Cole to Knee Injuries

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about Knee Injuries.
Brian Cole
Connection Strength
17.457
Knee Injuries
  1. The Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes After Knee Cartilage Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2021 01; 49(1):193-199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.598
  2. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Microfracture of the Knee: A Psychometric Analysis at Short-term Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):876-883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.567
  3. Return to Sport and Work After High Tibial Osteotomy With Concomitant Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplant. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3090-3096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.556
  4. Clinical Outcomes of Revision Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.549
  5. Analysis of Defect Size and Ratio to Condylar Size With Respect to Outcomes After Isolated Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1601-1612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.537
  6. Cartilage Restoration Surgery: Incidence Rates, Complications, and Trends as Reported by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Candidates. Arthroscopy. 2019 01; 35(1):171-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.524
  7. Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee: Patient Health Literacy, Expectations for Management, and Clinical Outcomes. Cartilage. 2021 04; 12(2):139-145.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.521
  8. Reoperation Rates After Cartilage Restoration Procedures in the Knee: Analysis of a Large US Commercial Database. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jun; 47(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  9. The Utility of Biologics, Osteotomy, and Cartilage Restoration in the Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Jan 01; 26(1):e11-e25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.489
  10. Does Treatment of the Tibia Matter in Bipolar Chondral Defects of the Knee? Clinical Outcomes with Greater Than 2 Years Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1044-1051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.486
  11. Can Competitive Athletes Return to High-Level Play After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee? Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep; 33(9):1712-1717.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.478
  12. Failure of Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2017 Mar; 25(1):2-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.462
  13. Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee: Analysis of Failures at 5 Years. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar; 45(4):864-874.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.457
  14. Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Improves Knee-Specific Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescent Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 45(1):70-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.449
  15. Comprehensiveness of Outcome Reporting in Studies of Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Arthroscopy. 2016 10; 32(10):2133-2139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  16. Clinical Evaluation and Preoperative Planning of Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Oct; 23(10):633-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.417
  17. Trends in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the United States, 2007 to 2011. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1123-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  18. Meniscal allograft transplantation: preoperative assessment, surgical considerations, and clinical outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2014 Dec; 27(6):443-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.383
  19. Trends in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among National Basketball Association team physicians. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Jun; 43(6):267-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  20. Management of patellofemoral chondral injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 33(3):477-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.381
  21. Clinical results of combined meniscus and femoral osteochondral allograft transplantation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2014 Aug; 30(8):964-70.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  22. Clinical, Radiographic, and Histological Outcomes After Cartilage Repair With Particulated Juvenile Articular Cartilage: A 2-Year Prospective Study. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun; 42(6):1417-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.378
  23. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear. N Engl J Med. 2014 03 27; 370(13):1260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  24. New England journal of medicine article evaluating the usefulness of meniscectomy is flawed. Arthroscopy. 2014 May; 30(5):542-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.376
  25. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.373
  26. Complex cartilage cases in the athletic patient: advances in malalignment, instability, articular defects, and meniscal insufficiency. Phys Sportsmed. 2013 Nov; 41(4):41-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.367
  27. Return to high-level sport after meniscal allograft transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):539-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  28. Effects of serial sectioning and repair of radial tears in the lateral meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug; 40(8):1863-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.335
  29. Outcomes after a single-stage procedure for cell-based cartilage repair: a prospective clinical safety trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 39(6):1170-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  30. Prospective evaluation of concurrent meniscus transplantation and articular cartilage repair: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Sep; 36(9):1770-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  31. What's new in the treatment of focal chondral defects of the knee? Orthopedics. 2006 10; 29(10):898-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  32. Basic science and treatment options for articular cartilage injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Oct; 36(10):717-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  33. Patient evaluation and surgical decision making. J Knee Surg. 2004 Oct; 17(4):219-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  34. Association Between Baseline Meniscal Symptoms and Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Meniscal Tear in Patients With Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 08; 74(8):1384-1390.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  35. Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  36. Chondral injuries. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Mar; 14(2):134-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  37. How Should We Define Clinically Significant Improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test for Patients Undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery? Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):241-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  38. Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Medial Meniscal Root Tears Shows Favorable Outcomes in Well-Aligned, Nonarthritic Knees: Letter to the Editor. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug; 47(10):NP53-NP54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  39. In?Vitro Analysis of Micronized Cartilage Stability in the Knee: Effect of Fibrin Level, Defect Size, and Defect Location. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1212-1218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  40. The multiple ligament injured knee. Clin Sports Med. 1999 Jan; 18(1):241-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  41. Video Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Professional American Football Athletes: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2018 12; 46(14):NP73-NP74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  42. Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2501-2509.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  43. Dynamic 3-Dimensional Mapping of Isometric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Is Anatomic Also Isometric? Arthroscopy. 2018 08; 34(8):2466-2475.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  44. Video Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Professional American Football Athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 03; 46(4):862-868.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  45. Pirfenidone reduces subchondral bone loss and fibrosis after murine knee cartilage injury. J Orthop Res. 2018 01; 36(1):365-376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  46. Hamstring Activity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patient: Injury Implications and Comparison With Quadriceps Activity. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1651-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  47. Quality and Variability of Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols From Academic Orthopaedic Surgery Programs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1612-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  48. Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  49. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 May; 23(5):283-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  50. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  51. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  52. Clinical outcome of revision meniscal allograft transplantation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1602-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  53. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  54. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation and Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):1583-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  55. Allograft reconstruction for extensor mechanism injuries. J Knee Surg. 2014 Dec; 27(6):489-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  56. Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19; 96(4):292-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  57. Graft tensioning during knee ligament reconstruction: principles and practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Oct; 20(10):633-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  58. Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for patients with articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct; 40(10):2264-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  59. The MeTeOR trial (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research): rationale and design features. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Nov; 33(6):1189-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  60. Prospective long-term evaluation of meniscal allograft transplantation procedure: a minimum of 7-year follow-up. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):165-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  61. Particulated articular cartilage: CAIS and DeNovo NT. J Knee Surg. 2012 Mar; 25(1):23-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  62. Clinical cartilage restoration: evolution and overview. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Oct; 469(10):2696-705.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  63. Interobserver reliability of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med. 2011 May; 39(5):926-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  64. Abnormal findings on knee magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic NBA players. J Knee Surg. 2008 Jan; 21(1):27-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  65. Allograft meniscus transplantation: background, indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2006 Jul; 19(3):220-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  66. Allograft interference screw fixation in meniscus transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2004 Mar; 20(3):322-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  67. Epinephrine-induced pulmonary edema during arthroscopic knee surgery. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May; 85(5):913-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  68. Dynamic Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Mapping of Isometric Posterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Single- Versus Double-Bundle Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2875-2884.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  69. Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  70. High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16; 97(18):1529-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  71. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  72. Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 02; 368(18):1675-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  73. Articular and meniscal pathology associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2013 Jun; 26(3):185-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  74. An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  75. Science and animal models of marrow stimulation for cartilage repair. J Knee Surg. 2012 Mar; 25(1):3-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.