Header Logo

Connection

Brian Cole to Cohort Studies

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about Cohort Studies.
Brian Cole
Connection Strength
1.644
Cohort Studies
  1. Clinically Significant Outcomes Following the Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee With Microfracture Augmentation Using Cartilage Allograft Extracellular Matrix: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1512-1521.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  2. Understanding the difference between symptoms of focal cartilage defects and osteoarthritis of the knee: a matched cohort analysis. Int Orthop. 2021 07; 45(7):1761-1766.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  3. The Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes After Knee Cartilage Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2021 01; 49(1):193-199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  4. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  5. Analysis of Defect Size and Ratio to Condylar Size With Respect to Outcomes After Isolated Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1601-1612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  6. Preoperative Tibial Subchondral Bone Marrow Lesion Patterns and Associations With Outcomes After Isolated Meniscus Allograft Transplantation. Am J Sports Med. 2018 04; 46(5):1175-1184.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  7. Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation With and Without Concomitant Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: A Comparative Matched Group Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018 03; 46(3):573-580.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  8. Do Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Differ Based on Age and Sex? A Comparative Matched Group Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018 01; 46(1):181-191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  9. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Goutallier classification using magnetic resonance imaging: proposal of a simplified classification system to increase reliability. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug; 40(8):1728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  10. Outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation in a diverse patient population. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jul; 37(7):1344-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  11. A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2023 09; 51(11):2869-2880.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  12. Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2023 03; 51(3):605-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  13. Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  14. Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative. Am J Sports Med. 2022 06; 50(7):1788-1797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  15. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  16. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  17. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 02; 37(2):600-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  18. Influence of workers' compensation status on postoperative outcomes in patients following biceps tenodesis: a matched-pair cohort analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec; 29(12):2530-2537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Perioperative Opioid Use Predicts Postoperative Opioid Use and Inferior Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2645-2654.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  20. The Impact of Workers' Compensation on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity and Legacy Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 10; 35(10):2817-2824.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  21. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  22. Influence of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Outcome of Arthroscopic Meniscectomy and Physical Therapy Treatment of Meniscal Tears in Osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):612-619.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  23. Ninety-day complications following the Latarjet procedure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan; 28(1):88-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  24. Video Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Professional American Football Athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 03; 46(4):862-868.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  25. Outcomes of Latarjet Versus Distal Tibia Allograft for Anterior Shoulder Instability Repair: A Matched Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018 04; 46(5):1030-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  26. Combined SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis for superior labral anterior-posterior tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec; 24(12):3870-3876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  27. A comprehensive analysis of pectoralis major transfer for long thoracic nerve palsy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jul; 24(7):1028-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  28. Rate of return to pitching and performance after Tommy John surgery in Major League Baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar; 42(3):536-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  29. Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60?years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar; 23(3):395-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  30. Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for patients with articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct; 40(10):2264-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  31. Retrospective analysis of arthroscopic management of glenohumeral degenerative disease. Arthroscopy. 2010 Nov; 26(11):1451-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  32. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2010 May; 38(5):891-902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  33. Use of a type I/III bilayer collagen membrane decreases reoperation rates for symptomatic hypertrophy after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov; 37 Suppl 1:20S-23S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  34. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis and treatment of SLAP tears using the Snyder classification. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jul; 36(7):1373-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  35. Open Bankart repair versus arthroscopic repair with transglenoid sutures or bioabsorbable tacks for Recurrent Anterior instability of the shoulder: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Sep; 32(6):1520-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  36. Living-unrelated renal transplantation provides comparable results to living-related renal transplantation: a 12-year single-center experience. Surgery. 1996 May; 119(5):538-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.