Header Logo

Connection

Charles Bush-Joseph to Adolescent

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Bush-Joseph has written about Adolescent.
Charles Bush-Joseph
Connection Strength
0.600
Adolescent
  1. Allograft reconstruction for extensor mechanism injuries. J Knee Surg. 2014 Dec; 27(6):489-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  2. Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb; 33(2):284-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  3. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  4. Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Jan-Feb; 29(1):36-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  5. Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011. J Orthop Res. 2021 02; 39(2):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  6. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  7. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  8. The Influence of Pain in Other Major Joints and the Spine on 2-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3196-3201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  9. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  10. Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  11. Injuries to the Female Athlete in 2017: Part I: General Considerations, Concussions, Stress Fractures, and the Female Athlete Triad. JBJS Rev. 2017 10; 5(10):e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  12. The Impact of Fatigue on Baseball Pitching Mechanics in Adolescent Male Pitchers. Arthroscopy. 2016 05; 32(5):762-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  13. Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar; 32(3):468-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  14. Sex Differences in Patients With CAM Deformities With Femoroacetabular Impingement: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Quantification. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec; 31(12):2301-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  15. Trends in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in the United States: A Retrospective Review of a Large Private-Payer Database From 2007 to 2011. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul; 43(7):1770-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  16. Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  17. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  18. Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  19. Outcomes of arthroscopic and open surgical repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Sep; 28(9):1306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  20. An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  21. Internal fixation of unstable Cahill Type-2C osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee in adolescent patients. Orthopedics. 2007 06; 30(6):487-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  22. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft. Arthroscopy. 2004 Oct; 20(8):787-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  23. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: An outcome analysis comparing gender. Arthroscopy. 2001 Jul; 17(6):588-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  24. Outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of charges and perioperative complications. Am J Knee Surg. 2001; 14(3):145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  25. Throwing-induced humeral shaft fracture in skeletally immature adolescents. Orthopedics. 1999 Jun; 22(6):621-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  26. Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):20-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  27. Single-incision endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Minimum two-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):30-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  28. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Am J Knee Surg. 1998; 11(4):221-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  29. Bilateral, asynchronous, apophyseal fractures in the pelvis and proximal femur. Orthopedics. 1997 Aug; 20(8):715-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. Knee dislocation without anterior cruciate ligament disruption. A report of three cases. Am J Knee Surg. 1996; 9(4):167-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.