Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Charles Bush-Joseph and Nikhil Verma.
Charles Bush-Joseph
Connection Strength
3.440
Nikhil Verma
  1. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  2. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  3. Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3447-3453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  4. Effect of Fatigue Protocols on Upper Extremity Neuromuscular Function and Implications for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury Prevention. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Dec; 7(12):2325967119888876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  5. ACL Reconstruction Graft Angle and Outcomes: Transtibial vs Anteromedial Reconstruction. HSS J. 2020 Dec; 16(Suppl 2):256-263.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  6. How many innings can we throw: does workload influence injury risk in Major League Baseball? An analysis of professional starting pitchers between 2010 and 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug; 27(8):1386-1392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  7. Utility of Modern Arthroscopic Simulator Training Models: A Meta-analysis and Updated Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1650-1677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  8. ACL Reconstruction Basics: Quadruple (4-Strand) Hamstring Autograft Harvest. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Aug; 6(4):e1309-e1313.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  9. Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries and Superior Labral Tears by Major League Baseball Team Physicians. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1271-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  10. Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  11. Postoperative restoration of upper extremity motion and neuromuscular control during the overhand pitch: evaluation of tenodesis and repair for superior labral anterior-posterior tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec; 42(12):2825-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  12. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  13. Utility of modern arthroscopic simulator training models. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jan; 30(1):121-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  14. Role of the superior labrum after biceps tenodesis in glenohumeral stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr; 23(4):485-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  15. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes after surgical repair of complete proximal hamstring ruptures: does the tendon heal? Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct; 40(10):2325-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  16. Outcomes of arthroscopic and open surgical repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Sep; 28(9):1306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  17. Effects of graft rotation on initial biomechanical failure characteristics of bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct; 31(5):708-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  18. Evaluation of Social Media and Online Utilization Among Members of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine: Implications in Practice. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Apr; 11(4):23259671221143567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  19. Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  20. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Associated Variables for Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3479-3486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  22. Impact of Simulation Training on Diagnostic Arthroscopy Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov; 1(1):e47-e57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  23. Anatomy of the Pudendal Nerve and Other Neural Structures Around the Proximal Hamstring Origin in Males. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2105-2110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  24. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Basics: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Harvest. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Aug; 6(4):e1189-e1194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  25. Length of time between surgery and return to sport after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers does not predict need for revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr; 26(4):699-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  26. Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears of the Elbow: Is Repair a Viable Option? Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 5(1):2325967116682211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  27. Should We Limit Innings Pitched After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers? Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep; 44(9):2210-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  28. Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in major league baseball players: Where do we stand? World J Orthop. 2016 Jun 18; 7(6):355-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  29. The Impact of Fatigue on Baseball Pitching Mechanics in Adolescent Male Pitchers. Arthroscopy. 2016 05; 32(5):762-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  30. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: The Rush Experience. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Jan; 4(1):2325967115626876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  31. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 Dec; 3(12):2325967115618914.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  32. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Sports Health. 2015 Nov-Dec; 7(6):511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  33. Synovial chemokine expression and relationship with knee symptoms in patients with meniscal tears. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul; 23(7):1158-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  34. Does Operative Treatment of First-Time Patellar Dislocations Lead to Increased Patellofemoral Stability? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1207-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  35. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  36. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  37. Closure of patellar tendon defect in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):329-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  38. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):364-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  39. Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  40. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  41. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  42. Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jan; 2(1):2325967113518305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  43. Return to Sport and Performance After Microfracture in the Knees of National Basketball Association Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Nov; 1(6):2325967113512759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  44. Open repair of retracted latissimus dorsi tendon avulsion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Jun; 42(6):280-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  45. Open repair of an acute latissimus tendon avulsion in a Major League Baseball pitcher. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul; 22(7):e19-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  46. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  47. Graft tensioning during knee ligament reconstruction: principles and practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Oct; 20(10):633-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  48. Synovial fluid from patients with early osteoarthritis modulates fibroblast-like synoviocyte responses to toll-like receptor 4 and toll-like receptor 2 ligands via soluble CD14. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jul; 64(7):2268-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  49. An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  50. Midterm results of surgical treatment for adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov; 37 Suppl 1:125S-30S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.