Header Logo

Connection

Richard Berger to Reoperation

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Berger has written about Reoperation.
Richard Berger
Connection Strength
1.265
Reoperation
  1. Complications Following Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a National Database. J Arthroplasty. 2017 05; 32(5):1426-1430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.412
  2. The Impact of an Acute, Traumatic Wound Dehiscence on Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 08; 33(8):2613-2615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  3. Buying Time: Long-Term Results of Wrist Denervation and Time to Repeat Surgery. Hand (N Y). 2019 09; 14(5):602-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  4. The Shift to Same-Day Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Arthroplasty. 2018 04; 33(4):1265-1274.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  5. Clinical comparison of arthroscopic versus open repair of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 May-Jun; 33(5):675-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  6. Reevaluating isolated polyethylene revision for instability after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2023 Jun; 42:186-192.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  7. Staged BiCompartmental Knee Arthroplasty has Greater Functional Improvement, but Equivalent Midterm Survivorship, as Revision TKA for Progressive Osteoarthritis After Partial Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022 07; 37(7):1260-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  8. Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Tibial Revision With Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7):2536-2540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  9. Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 05; 35(5):1402-1406.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  10. Outcomes of Isolated Head and Liner Exchange Using Large Femoral Heads and Modern Liners in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 04; 35(4):1064-1068.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  11. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age: Results at a Mean of 13 Years. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct; 34(10):2392-2397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  12. Constrained Implant Arthroplasty for Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthrosis: Evaluation and Management of Soft Tissue Complications. J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jul; 44(7):614.e1-614.e9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  13. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  14. Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):229-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  15. The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  17. Revision total knee arthroplasty for stiffness. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):62-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  18. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  19. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  21. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  22. Surgical exposures in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May; 446:59-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  23. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  24. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug; 87(8):1795-800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  25. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Dec; 86(12):2694-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  26. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  27. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.