Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Bernard Bach and Charles Bush-Joseph.
Bernard Bach
Connection Strength
5.949
Charles Bush-Joseph
  1. Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb; 33(2):284-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  2. Migration of femoral interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1998; 11(1):32-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  3. Injuries to the Female Athlete in 2017: Part I: General Considerations, Concussions, Stress Fractures, and the Female Athlete Triad. JBJS Rev. 2017 10; 5(10):e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  4. Injuries to the Female Athlete in 2017: Part II: Upper and Lower-Extremity Injuries. JBJS Rev. 2017 10; 5(10):e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  5. ACL Reconstruction Basics: Quadruple (4-Strand) Hamstring Autograft Harvest. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Aug; 6(4):e1309-e1313.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  6. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Basics: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Harvest. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Aug; 6(4):e1189-e1194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  7. Economic Analyses in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative and Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2016 May; 44(5):1329-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  8. Does Operative Treatment of First-Time Patellar Dislocations Lead to Increased Patellofemoral Stability? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1207-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  9. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  10. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  11. Closure of patellar tendon defect in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):329-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  12. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):364-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  13. Return to Pitching After Tommy John Surgery: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):NP40a-b.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  14. Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  15. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  16. Allograft reconstruction for extensor mechanism injuries. J Knee Surg. 2014 Dec; 27(6):489-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  17. Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jan; 2(1):2325967113518305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  18. Paget-schroetter syndrome: a review of effort thrombosis of the upper extremity from a sports medicine perspective. Sports Health. 2013 Jul; 5(4):353-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  19. Return to sport following shoulder surgery in the elite pitcher: a systematic review. Sports Health. 2013 Jul; 5(4):367-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  20. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  21. Graft tensioning during knee ligament reconstruction: principles and practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Oct; 20(10):633-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  22. Subacromial Space Injections. Phys Sportsmed. 1992 Feb; 20(2):93-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  23. The surgical approach to lateral meniscal repair. Arthroscopy. 1992; 8(2):269-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  24. The diagnosis and management of spontaneous and post-arthroscopy osteonecrosis of the knee. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011; 69(4):320-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  25. The incidence of acute patellar tendon harvest complications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb; 24(2):162-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  26. Internal fixation of unstable Cahill Type-2C osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee in adolescent patients. Orthopedics. 2007 06; 30(6):487-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  27. Evaluation of the medial elbow in the throwing athlete. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006 Jun; 35(6):266-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  28. Complete rupture of large tendons: risk factors, signs, and definitive treatment. Phys Sportsmed. 2005 Aug; 33(8):19-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  29. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft. Arthroscopy. 2004 Oct; 20(8):787-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  30. Effects of graft rotation on initial biomechanical failure characteristics of bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct; 31(5):708-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  31. Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2023 03; 51(3):605-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  32. Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  33. Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative. Am J Sports Med. 2022 06; 50(7):1788-1797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  34. Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  35. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  36. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  37. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  38. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  39. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Associated Variables for Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3479-3486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  40. Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Jan-Feb; 29(1):36-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  41. Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011. J Orthop Res. 2021 02; 39(2):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  42. Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2020 10; 48(12):2978-2985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  43. Impact of Simulation Training on Diagnostic Arthroscopy Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov; 1(1):e47-e57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  44. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  45. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  46. Throwing-induced humeral shaft fracture in skeletally immature adolescents. Orthopedics. 1999 Jun; 22(6):621-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  47. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Phys Sportsmed. 1998 Aug; 26(8):31-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  48. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  49. Functional gait adaptations in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency over time. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar; (348):166-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  50. Utility of Modern Arthroscopic Simulator Training Models: A Meta-analysis and Updated Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1650-1677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  51. Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):20-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  52. Single-incision endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Minimum two-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb; 26(1):30-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  53. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Am J Knee Surg. 1998; 11(4):221-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  54. Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  55. Bilateral, asynchronous, apophyseal fractures in the pelvis and proximal femur. Orthopedics. 1997 Aug; 20(8):715-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  56. Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep; 45(11):2586-2594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  57. Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  58. Length of time between surgery and return to sport after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers does not predict need for revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr; 26(4):699-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  59. Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears of the Elbow: Is Repair a Viable Option? Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 5(1):2325967116682211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  60. Patterns of meniscal injury in the anterior cruciate-deficient knee: a review of the literature. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Jan; 26(1):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  61. Functional adaptations in patients with ACL-deficient knees. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997; 25:1-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  62. Do Clinical Results and Return-to-Sport Rates After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Differ Based on Graft Choice and Surgical Technique? Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Nov; 4(11):2325967116670142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  63. Comparison of screw post fixation and free bone block interference fixation for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts: biomechanical considerations. Arthroscopy. 1996 Aug; 12(4):470-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  64. Should We Limit Innings Pitched After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers? Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep; 44(9):2210-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  65. Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in major league baseball players: Where do we stand? World J Orthop. 2016 Jun 18; 7(6):355-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  66. Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries and Superior Labral Tears by Major League Baseball Team Physicians. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1271-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  67. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: The Rush Experience. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Jan; 4(1):2325967115626876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  68. Knee dislocation without anterior cruciate ligament disruption. A report of three cases. Am J Knee Surg. 1996; 9(4):167-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  69. Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  70. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Sports Health. 2015 Nov-Dec; 7(6):511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  71. Distal biceps brachii repair. Results in dominant and nondominant extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Aug; (317):114-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  72. Trends in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in the United States: A Retrospective Review of a Large Private-Payer Database From 2007 to 2011. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul; 43(7):1770-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  73. Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  74. Posterior cortical violation of the femoral tunnel during endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1995; 8(4):130-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  75. Intraarticular placement of Kurosaka interference screws. Arthroscopy. 1994 Aug; 10(4):412-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  76. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  77. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  78. Rate of return to pitching and performance after Tommy John surgery in Major League Baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar; 42(3):536-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  79. Utility of modern arthroscopic simulator training models. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jan; 30(1):121-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  80. Return to Sport and Performance After Microfracture in the Knees of National Basketball Association Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Nov; 1(6):2325967113512759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  81. Performance and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in X-Games Skiers and Snowboarders. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Nov; 1(6):2325967113511196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  82. Performance and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Male Major League Soccer Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Jul; 1(2):2325967113497189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  83. Open repair of an acute latissimus tendon avulsion in a Major League Baseball pitcher. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul; 22(7):e19-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  84. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  85. Outcomes of arthroscopic and open surgical repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Sep; 28(9):1306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  86. An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  87. Massive heterotopic ossification after biceps tendon rupture and tenodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jun; (255):284-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  88. The kinetic chain in overhand pitching: its potential role for performance enhancement and injury prevention. Sports Health. 2010 Mar; 2(2):135-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  89. Midterm results of surgical treatment for adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov; 37 Suppl 1:125S-30S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  90. Shoulder pain in the overhead throwing athlete. Sports Health. 2009 Mar; 1(2):108-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  91. Integration of arthroscopic and C-arm imaging into the arthroscopic image management system: technical note. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jan; 20(1):39-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  92. Comparison of ultrasonic suture welding and traditional knot tying in a rabbit rotator cuff repair model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct; 15(5):630-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  93. The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  94. Postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jan; 17(1):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  95. Endoscopic single-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: surgical technique. 1992 [classical article]. J Knee Surg. 2003 Jul; 16(3):135-44; discussion 145-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  96. Comparison of clinical and dynamic knee function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb; 31(1):68-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  97. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: An outcome analysis comparing gender. Arthroscopy. 2001 Jul; 17(6):588-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  98. Outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of charges and perioperative complications. Am J Knee Surg. 2001; 14(3):145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  99. Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with Workers' Compensation claims. Arthroscopy. 2000 Jan-Feb; 16(1):49-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  100. Results of arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic loss of extension following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 2000; 13(4):201-9; discussion 209-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  101. A prospective study of pain and analgesic use in outpatient endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1998 Sep; 14(6):613-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  102. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Phys Sportsmed. 1996 Jun; 24(6):73-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  103. Cost containment: a charge comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1996 Apr; 12(2):160-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  104. Comparison of "inside-out" and "outside-in" interference screw fixation for anterior cruciate ligament surgery in a bovine knee. Arthroscopy. 1996 Feb; 12(1):76-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  105. Trends in decreased hospitalization for anterior cruciate ligament surgery: double-incision versus single-incision reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1995 Apr; 11(2):134-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.