 Peer Review
"Peer Review" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
| Descriptor ID |
D010380
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549 I01.880.604.640 N03.706.700
|
| Concept/Terms |
Peer Review- Peer Review
- Review, Peer
- Peer Reviews
- Reviews, Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2007 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2015 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2017 | 2 | 0 | 2 | | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review" by people in Profiles.
-
Urban MJ, Shimomura A, Shah S, Losenegger T, Westrick J, Jagasia AA. Rural Otolaryngology Care Disparities: A Scoping Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 06; 166(6):1219-1227.
-
Garg N, Gottlieb M. Resident Research Tips: Surviving and Thriving Within the Peer Review Process. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Feb; 71(2):247-251.
-
Yarris LM, Gottlieb M, Scott K, Sampson C, Rose E, Chan TM, Ilgen J. Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review. West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun; 18(4):721-728.
-
Cowell JM. Peer-Review Responsibility. J Sch Nurs. 2015 Dec; 31(6):395.
-
Conn VS, Zerwic J, Jefferson U, Anderson CM, Killion CM, Smith CE, Cohen MZ, Fahrenwald NL, Herrick L, Topp R, Benefield LE, Loya J. Normalizing Rejection. West J Nurs Res. 2016 Feb; 38(2):137-54.
-
Cowell JM. Importance of peer review. J Sch Nurs. 2014 Dec; 30(6):394-5.
-
Cowell JM. Should we care about quality indicators for nursing journals? J Sch Nurs. 2012 Aug; 28(4):250-1.
-
Kleinpell R. Evidence-based review and discussion points. Am J Crit Care. 2007 Sep; 16(5):445-6.
-
Grote CL, Lewin JL, Sweet JJ, van Gorp WG. Responses to perceived unethical practices in clinical neuropsychology: ethical and legal considerations. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb; 14(1):119-34.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|