 Sensitivity and Specificity
"Sensitivity and Specificity" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed)
| Descriptor ID |
D012680
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
E05.318.740.872 E05.318.780.800 G17.800 N05.715.360.750.725 N05.715.360.780.700 N06.850.520.445.800 N06.850.520.830.872
|
| Concept/Terms |
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Sensitivity and Specificity".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Sensitivity and Specificity".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Sensitivity and Specificity" by people in this website by year, and whether "Sensitivity and Specificity" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | | 1992 | 0 | 4 | 4 | | 1993 | 0 | 3 | 3 | | 1995 | 0 | 4 | 4 | | 1996 | 0 | 7 | 7 | | 1997 | 0 | 8 | 8 | | 1998 | 0 | 6 | 6 | | 1999 | 0 | 9 | 9 | | 2000 | 0 | 11 | 11 | | 2001 | 0 | 5 | 5 | | 2002 | 0 | 21 | 21 | | 2003 | 0 | 18 | 18 | | 2004 | 0 | 17 | 17 | | 2005 | 0 | 30 | 30 | | 2006 | 0 | 30 | 30 | | 2007 | 0 | 20 | 20 | | 2008 | 0 | 30 | 30 | | 2009 | 0 | 21 | 21 | | 2010 | 0 | 18 | 18 | | 2011 | 0 | 22 | 22 | | 2012 | 0 | 23 | 23 | | 2013 | 0 | 24 | 24 | | 2014 | 0 | 17 | 17 | | 2015 | 0 | 24 | 24 | | 2016 | 0 | 22 | 22 | | 2017 | 0 | 13 | 13 | | 2018 | 0 | 22 | 22 | | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | | 2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Sensitivity and Specificity" by people in Profiles.
-
Moore NM, Li H, Schejbal D, Lindsley J, Hayden MK. Comparison of Two Commercial Molecular Tests and a Laboratory-Developed Modification of the CDC 2019-nCoV Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 07 23; 58(8).
-
Li J, Zhang B, Liu WX, Lu K, Pan H, Wang T, Oh CD, Yi D, Huang J, Zhao L, Ning G, Xing C, Xiao G, Liu-Bryan R, Feng S, Chen D. Metformin limits osteoarthritis development and progression through activation of AMPK signalling. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 05; 79(5):635-645.
-
Zhou LQ, Wu XL, Huang SY, Wu GG, Ye HR, Wei Q, Bao LY, Deng YB, Li XR, Cui XW, Dietrich CF. Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction from Primary Breast Cancer US Images Using Deep Learning. Radiology. 2020 01; 294(1):19-28.
-
Charidimou A, Frosch MP, Al-Shahi Salman R, Baron JC, Cordonnier C, Hernandez-Guillamon M, Linn J, Raposo N, Rodrigues M, Romero JR, Schneider JA, Schreiber S, Smith EE, van Buchem MA, Viswanathan A, Wollenweber FA, Werring DJ, Greenberg SM. Advancing diagnostic criteria for sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Study protocol for a multicenter MRI-pathology validation of Boston criteria v2.0. Int J Stroke. 2019 12; 14(9):956-971.
-
Siddiqi OK, Birbeck GL, Ghebremichael M, Mubanga E, Love S, Buback C, Kosloff B, Ayles H, Atadzhanov M, Dheda K, Koralnik IJ. Prospective Cohort Study on Performance of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Xpert MTB/RIF, CSF Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) Lateral Flow Assay (LFA), and Urine LAM LFA for Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis in Zambia. J Clin Microbiol. 2019 08; 57(8).
-
Sun Y, Deng J, Qian Y, Zhu R, Wang F, Tian R, De R, Zhao L. Laboratory Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for More-Sensitive Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Antigen. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 21; 72(6):394-398.
-
Gottlieb M, Holladay D, Peksa GD. Point-of-Care Ocular Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 08; 26(8):931-939.
-
Luryi AL, Michaelides EM, Babu S, Bojrab DI, Kveton JF, Hong RS, Zappia J, Sargent EW, Schutt CA. Reliability of clinical diagnosis of masses of the cerebellopontine angle: A retrospective multi-institutional study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar - Apr; 40(2):133-136.
-
Martin RL, Kivlan BR, Christoforetti JJ, Wolff AB, Nho SJ, Salvo JP, Ellis TJ, Van Thiel G, Matsuda DK, Carreira DS. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):411-416.
-
Doukky R, Improvola G, Shih MJ, Costello BT, Munoz-Pena JM, Golzar Y, Margeta B, Bai CJ. Usefulness of Oximetry Paradoxus to Diagnose Cardiac Tamponade. Am J Cardiol. 2019 02 01; 123(3):498-506.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|