Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Timothy Larsen and Henry Huang.
Timothy Larsen
Connection Strength
5.531
Henry Huang
  1. Comparison of ablation index versus time-guided radiofrequency energy dosing using normal and half-normal saline irrigation in a porcine left ventricular model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 04; 33(4):698-712.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.810
  2. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation from the coronary cusps and endocardial left ventricular outflow tract for left ventricular summit ventricular arrhythmias in a porcine and infrared thermal model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 03; 33(3):551-556.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.809
  3. Use of infrared thermography to delineate temperature gradients and critical isotherms during catheter ablation with normal and half normal saline: Implications for safety and efficacy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 08; 32(8):2035-2044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.774
  4. Surpoint algorithm for improved guidance of ablation for ventricular tachycardia (SURFIRE-VT): A pilot study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Jan 04.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  5. Evolving Concepts in Cardiac Physiologic Pacing in the Era of Conduction System Pacing. Am J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 26; 212:51-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  6. Transthoracic Echocardiographic Characteristics of Patients Who Underwent Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2023 10 15; 205:173-175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  7. Feasibility and safety of laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with prior left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 11; 33(11):2389-2393.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  8. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing radiofrequency catheter ablation with medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan; 66(1):161-175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  9. Wide area circumferential ablation for pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency versus laser balloon ablation. J Arrhythm. 2022 Jun; 38(3):336-345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  10. Mortality benefit of catheter ablation versus medical therapy in atrial fibrillation: An RCT only meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 02; 33(2):178-193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  11. High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2021 05 21; 23(5):710-721.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  12. Safety and Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Combination Therapy for Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Propensity-Matched Study. Cardiol Ther. 2020 Dec; 9(2):523-534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  13. Cryoballoon Ablation and Bipolar Voltage Mapping in Patients With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices. Am J Cardiol. 2020 11 15; 135:99-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  14. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 10; 31(10):2559-2571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  15. Comparison between minimal fluoroscopy and conventional approaches for visually guided laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 07; 31(7):1608-1615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  16. Supplemental Radiofrequency Ablation After Acutely Unsuccessful Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation is Associated With Increased Risk of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 05 18; 9(10):e015979.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  17. Meta-analysis of pulmonary vein isolation ablation for atrial fibrillation conventional vs low- and zero-fluoroscopy approaches. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 06; 31(6):1403-1412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  18. Comparison of electrocautery platforms for pulse generator replacement procedures. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 09; 64(3):557-558.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  19. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2022 08; 19(8):1263-1271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  20. New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared With Right Ventricular Pacing. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022 04; 15(4):e010710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  21. Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2022 01; 19(1):3-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  22. Pros and Cons of Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Single-Center Experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 12; 13(12):e008874.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  23. Development of New-Onset or Progressive Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Permanent HIS Bundle Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing: Results From the RUSH HBP Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 11 17; 9(22):e018478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  24. Sensors for rate-adaptive pacing: How they work, strengths, and limitations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 11; 31(11):3009-3027.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.