Header Logo

Connection

Jorge Chahla to Adult

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jorge Chahla has written about Adult.
Connection Strength

1.239
  1. Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair Show Similar Improvement in Outcome Scores, But Repair Shows Higher Rates of Knee Stiffness and Failure: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 10; 39(10):2231-2240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  2. Complication Rates After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Range From 0% to 32% With 0% to 11% Recurrent Instability: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 05; 39(5):1345-1356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  3. Injury to the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus from a Misplaced Tibial Tunnel for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report. Am J Case Rep. 2022 Nov 03; 23:e937581.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  4. Preoperative symptom duration does not affect clinical outcomes after high tibial osteotomy at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. J ISAKOS. 2022 08; 7(4):60-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  5. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patella Alta: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 06; 50(7):2042-2051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  6. No Differences in Hip Joint Space Measurements Between Weightbearing or Supine Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2843-2848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  7. Dynamic Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Mapping of Isometric Posterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Single- Versus Double-Bundle Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2875-2884.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  8. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Microfracture of the Knee: A Psychometric Analysis at Short-term Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):876-883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  9. Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  10. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2626-2635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  11. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  12. Return to Sport After Nonoperative Management of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2023 12; 51(14):3858-3869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  13. Biceps Tenodesis in Patients Age 35 Years and Younger Yields Favorable Clinical Outcomes With Variable Rates of Return to Sport and Complications: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):830-837.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  14. Recurrence of Hamstring Injuries and Risk Factors for Partial and Complete Tears in the National Football League: An Analysis From 2009-2020. Phys Sportsmed. 2023 04; 51(2):139-143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  15. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  16. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  17. Preoperative psychometric properties of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity, Pain Interference, and Depression in Bankart repair and rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct; 30(10):2225-2230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  18. High Rate of Full Duty Return to Work After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Workers Who Are Not on Workers' Compensation. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):729-736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  19. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  20. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Five-Year Results in 140 Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021 01; 49(1):90-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  21. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 02; 37(2):600-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  22. Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  23. A Cadaveric Study of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: Biomechanical Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Cam Morphology, Partial Femoral Osteoplasty, and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2425-2432.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  24. The quadriceps insertion of the medial patellofemoral complex demonstrates the greatest anisometry through flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar; 29(3):757-763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  25. The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  26. Quantifying the Opportunity Cost of Resident Involvement in Academic Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Matched-Pair Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):834-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  27. Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  28. Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1022-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  29. Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3240-3247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  30. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  31. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  32. Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  33. Influence of Cigarette Smoking at the Time of Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched-Pair Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1138-1144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  34. High Rate of Return to Swimming After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1471-1477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.